30.01.2013 Views

References

References

References

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

328 J. Fromm, S. Lautner<br />

hastobedoneontheresponsivenessofthevarioustypesofmoleculesthat<br />

are involved in electron transport during electrical signalling.<br />

Apart from Mimosa,consequencesofphloem-transmittedelectricalsignals<br />

were also reported for tomato plants. They respond to wounding by the<br />

induction of proteinase inhibitor (PI) activity in parts of the shoot distant<br />

from the wound (Ryan 1990; Bowles 1990). The signal linking the wound<br />

site with the induction of PI activity was suggested to be either chemical,<br />

hydraulic or electrical. Wildon et al. (1992) provided evidence that the<br />

systemic wound signal is a propagated electrical signal. Their hypothesis<br />

is that the electrical signal passes from the wound site to the site of PI<br />

induction through electrically excitable cells that are coupled via plasmodesmata.<br />

Rhodes et al. (1996) studied the pathway of the electrical signal<br />

in tomato and were able to show that the phloem is involved. In addition,<br />

Stankovic and Davies (1997) found a definite relationship to exist between<br />

action potentials that were stimulated electrically and large, rapid increases<br />

in pin transcript.<br />

Since long-distance transmission of electrical signals is associated with<br />

the phloem pathway it is obvious that action potentials have an effect on<br />

assimilate transport in the phloem. In maize leaves cold-shock as well<br />

as electric stimulation evoke action potentials which propagate via the<br />

sieve tubes away from the site of stimulation (Fromm and Bauer 1994).<br />

Simultaneously, phloem transport in distant leaf parts is sharply reduced,<br />

madevisiblebyautoradiographyatadistanceofover15cmfromthe<br />

stimulation site. Evidence of a link between electrical signalling and the<br />

interruption of phloem translocation was found through a decrease in<br />

symplasmic K + and Cl − concentrations during action potentials. According<br />

to Shiina and Tazawa (1986), who studied the effects of action potentials<br />

ontheelongationgrowthinthestemofLuffa cylindrica,K + and Cl − efflux<br />

from stimulated cells into the apoplast may reduce cell turgor and cause<br />

growth retardation. In maize, ion efflux during action potentials may also<br />

reduce the turgor of sieve tubes and trigger water efflux. Since water is<br />

the transport medium for assimilates, a reduction in water content will<br />

decrease phloem translocation (Fromm and Bauer 1994). However, the<br />

interruption of phloem translocation may also be attributed to reduced<br />

phloem loading because this process depends on the membrane potential<br />

and the K + concentration in sieve tubes. Therefore, repeated irrigations of<br />

the membrane potential during electrical signalling may have an effect on<br />

apoplastic phloem loading.<br />

Further studies on the consequences of phloem-transmitted electrical<br />

signalling showed that action potentials are involved in the regulation of<br />

gas exchange in maize (Fromm and Fei 1998). In these plants, the CO2<br />

uptake and transpiration rate decreased strongly in drying soil. Subsequently,<br />

plants were watered and increases in CO2 and H2Oexchangewere

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!