30.01.2013 Views

References

References

References

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

21<br />

Electrical Signals, the Cytoskeleton,<br />

and Gene Expression: a Hypothesis<br />

on the Coherence of the Cellular<br />

Responses to Environmental Insult<br />

Eric Davies, Bratislav Stankovic<br />

Abstract When plant tissue is abiotically injured by crushing, cutting, heat-wounding,<br />

electrical stimulation, or by several other means, the injured (perceiving) tissue generates<br />

electrical signals (action potentials and variation potentials) and transmits them to distant<br />

(responding) tissue. Here they evoke apparently disparate responses, such as callose formation,<br />

closing of plasmodesmata, stoppage of cytoplasmic streaming, inhibition of ribosome<br />

movement along messenger RNA (mRNA), and ultrarapid but transient accumulation of<br />

over 100 transcripts, which are degraded without being translated. These apparently disparate<br />

responses can be reconciled by one fundamental hypothesis that assumes that “the<br />

plant does not know what hit it” and thus “expecting the worst” mounts a holistic defense<br />

response against its most potent nemesis, a putative viral invasion. We postulate that the basis<br />

for this response is calcium influx into the cytoplasm via voltage-gated channels (action<br />

potential) associated with the microtubules, or via mechano-sensitive channels (variation<br />

potential) associated with microfilaments. The calcium interacts with calcium and/or<br />

calmodulin-dependent cytoskeleton-associated protein kinases. This causes the phosphorylation<br />

of myosin, which stops cytoplasmic streaming, and of elongation factor 2F, which<br />

slows elongation and termination and causes ribosomes to pile up on polyribosomes. This<br />

decreases protein synthesis, but protects preexisting “host” transcripts from degradation.<br />

The phosphorylation signal then passes into the nucleus, where it phosphorylates RNA<br />

polymerase II, which goes into overdrive (i.e., does not stop at accuracy checkpoints), thus<br />

causing the synthesis of large amounts of mismade mRNA. The mRNA is transported into<br />

the cytoplasm, where it is scanned (checked for accuracy) by ribosomes, and found to be incorrect.<br />

This surveillance mechanism stimulates ribonuclease activity, which degrades the<br />

free (non-polysome-associated), mismade RNA, but leaves the original, “host” transcripts<br />

unscathed since they are protected by ribosomes. The ribonuclease also (and here is the<br />

crux of the matter) attacks other free mRNAs, including viral mRNAs, so these are disposed<br />

of before they can be translated. Within minutes this reaction is over, cytoplasmic steaming<br />

resumes, translation continues, ribosomes are released and so can be used to translate new<br />

(correctly made) transcripts.<br />

21.1<br />

Introduction to the Hypothesis<br />

There are several different kinds of electrical activities in plants, including<br />

action potentials (APs), variation potentials (VPs), voltage spikes or voltage<br />

transients, and rhythmic electrical activities but their role is far from<br />

understood (Davies 1987b, 2004; Davies et al. 1991). They all involve ion<br />

fluxes across membranes and bring about changes in membrane potential.<br />

Communication in Plants<br />

F. Baluška, S. Mancuso, D. Volkmann (Eds.)<br />

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!