30.01.2013 Views

References

References

References

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12 A. Trewavas<br />

in which the life cycle is played out with occasional periods of stress that<br />

simply slow it down (Aphalo and Bellare 1995). An excellent analogy of the<br />

alternative active view posed here is to be found in social insects (Trewavas<br />

2005). Not only are there numerous exploratory trails or flights to find rich<br />

resources but, once discovered, changes in colony communication ensure<br />

numerous individuals (like proliferating leaves or branch roots) are actively<br />

employed in resource acquisition. The whole system benefits by the changes<br />

in foraging form. Bell (1984) has drawn analogies between plant branching<br />

and the foraging system of ants. The plant phenotype is constructed to<br />

benefit the whole organism using environmental signals that are internally<br />

assessed against current and previous experience. Competition is crucial;<br />

the poem by Hirshfield (2005) uses the term resilience, that is a strategy<br />

to deal with competition and to optimize the developing phenotype for<br />

maximal seed production. Describing plants as intelligent organisms is<br />

a conceptual change that indicates plants make dedicated active phenotypic<br />

decisions that improve accomplishment of the life cycle and fitness.<br />

A common mistake is to judge plant behaviour in human terms. Warwick<br />

(2001), who warns against such thinking, makes the important point of<br />

judging intelligence within the framework of the capability of the organism.<br />

For plants, phenotypic change is the most relevant criterion but this needs<br />

more detailed future analysis than space allows here.<br />

Finally, a major difficulty in recognizing intelligent behaviour in plants<br />

arises from an inability to assess root behaviour adequately. What is needed<br />

is a non-invasive method of imaging three-dimensional root distributions<br />

on a continuous basis. Various possibilities such as MRI or tomography or<br />

others need exploration. There have been a few attempts in the past (penetrating<br />

isotopes, slanting glass) but these are not very satisfactory. The<br />

ultimate goal should be instrumentation that can enable accurate, continuous,<br />

three-dimensional monitoring of tree root systems in the wild as well<br />

as much smaller plants. Current methods rely largely on the destructive<br />

procedures of exhumation. Only when the root system can be continually<br />

monitored will the intelligent integration of whole plant behaviour be<br />

properly revealed.<br />

<strong>References</strong><br />

Ackerley DD, Bazzaz FA (1995) Seedling crown orientation and interception of diffuse<br />

radiation in tropical forest gaps. Ecology 76:1134–1146<br />

Allmann JM (1999) Evolving brains. Scientific American Library, New York<br />

Alon U, Surette MG, Barkai N, Leibler S (1999) Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature<br />

397:168–171<br />

Alon U (2003) Biological networks: the tinkerer as engineer. Science 301:1866–1867<br />

Amzallag GN, Lerner HR, Poljakoff-Mayber A (1990) Induction of increased salt tolerance<br />

in Sorghum bicolor by sodium chloride treatment. J Exp Bot 41:29–34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!