30.01.2013 Views

References

References

References

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

428 V.Ninkovic,R.Glinwood,J.Pettersson<br />

28.3.1<br />

Allelobiosis and Aphid Response<br />

Aphids belong to widely distributed group of insects, of which numerous<br />

species are serious pests that damage plants mainly by sucking phloem<br />

sap, but also by transmitting plant viruses. Aphids make considerable use of<br />

chemical information in host plant location and selection, and are sensitive<br />

to changes in the quality and physiological status of their host plant (Pickett<br />

et al. 1992). Aphids feed by inserting a long flexible mouthpart, the stylet,<br />

directly into the phloem. Together, these factors make aphids an excellent<br />

model herbivore to detect changes in plants following allelobiosis.<br />

28.3.1.1<br />

Interspecific Allelobiosis and Aphid Host Plant Acceptance<br />

When barley plants of certain cultivars were exposed to allelobiotic chemicals<br />

from common weeds (using the exposure system described earlier),<br />

they became significantly less acceptable to the aphid Rhopalosiphum padi.<br />

This occurred when barley was exposed to root exudates from the couch<br />

grass Elytrigia repens (Glinwood et al. 2003) and to volatiles from the thistles<br />

Cirsium arvense and C. vulgare (Glinwood et al. 2004). R. padi showed<br />

no behavioural response to volatiles from Cirsium spp. directly, and a range<br />

of compounds previously identified in E. repens root exudates did not negatively<br />

affect R. padi feedingonanartificialmedium.Thus,exposureto<br />

allelobiosis from both weeds induced changes in barley plants that made<br />

them less acceptable for aphid feeding.<br />

28.3.1.2<br />

Intraspecific Allelobiosis and Aphid Host Plant Acceptance<br />

When barley plants of one cultivar were exposed to volatiles from plants of<br />

a different cultivar (using the exposure system described earlier), they became<br />

significantly less acceptable to R. padi.Thisoccurredonlyincertain<br />

pairwise combinations of four barley cultivars. This reduction of acceptability<br />

to the aphid also occurred when certain cultivars were exposed to<br />

volatiles from the same cultivar, i.e. self-exposure (Pettersson et al. 1999).<br />

Whenthepairwisecombinationswereplantedtogetherinalternaterows<br />

in the field, certain combinations again led to reduced aphid acceptance of<br />

particular cultivars, compared with pure stands of that cultivar (Ninkovic<br />

et al. 2002) (Fig. 28.4). Whereas in the laboratory system plants interact only<br />

via volatiles, planting in the field allows for interaction via both volatiles<br />

and root exudates, as well as the effects of competition and environmental<br />

factors.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!