07.02.2013 Views

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 39 April 6, 2001

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 39 April 6, 2001

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 39 April 6, 2001

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The hydrodynamics near steadily moving contact lines have been examined for a variety of material systems for low Capillary<br />

number, Cais much less than1, <strong>and</strong> negligible Reynolds number, Re = approximately 0. However, in nature <strong>and</strong> in technological<br />

applications, contact lines move under conditions of moderate Re <strong>and</strong> are often accelerating or decelerating. In both of these cases,<br />

the role of inertia in the hydrodynamics controlling spreading must be considered. In this paper, we will discuss these hydrodynamics<br />

in both the case of steady state motion of contact lines at moderate Re <strong>and</strong> the case of unsteady motion as the contact line accelerates<br />

or decelerates to a final steady state after a perturbation from another, initial, steady state. In our experiments we test models<br />

which incorporate inertia at steady state, <strong>and</strong> unsteady effects at essentially Re = 0. We first examine the steady state spreading<br />

of four (-CH3)-terminated silicone oils on dry pyrex surfaces in the presence of significant inertia. Our measurements of the apparent<br />

dynamic contact angle, omega(sub o), agree qualitatively with Cox’s predictions for this macroscopic contact angle <strong>and</strong> for<br />

the interface curvature when inertia is important. However, quantitative comparisons of the hydrodynamics cannot be made<br />

because of the lack of a uniformly valid asymptotic solution for the interface shape <strong>and</strong> the ambiguities arising from the variation<br />

in inner physics with contact line speed. We observe that the presence of inertia reduces the dynamic curvature in the interface<br />

shape <strong>and</strong> thus lowers omega(sub o). This is consistent with a simple picture of the effects of viscous forces <strong>and</strong> inertia. When<br />

inertia becomes non-negligible with respect to viscous forces, the dynamic pressure gradient near the fluid-vapor interface<br />

decreases. This is due to the fact that, when inertia becomes important, <strong>and</strong> all else being equal, the solid drags less fluid away<br />

from the contact line region. by mass conservation, less fluid must be brought into the contact line by flow along the liquid/vapor<br />

interface. This, in turn, implies that a smaller pressure gradient would be required along the interface to drive this smaller flow<br />

rate into the contact line region. by the dynamic boundary condition, this decreased dynamic pressure leads to a reduced local<br />

interface curvature compared to the purely viscous case as found in our experiments. In qualitative agreement with models incorporating<br />

inertia, the integrated effect of this reduced curvature at each point along the interface causes the reduction in omega(sub<br />

o) compared to the purely viscous case. We can contrast the successes <strong>and</strong> failures in comparing data to theory for the dependence<br />

of omega(sub o) versus Ca, for four methyl-terminated oils. The quantitative success of the purely viscous model in predicting<br />

omega(sub o) versus Ca for the three higher viscosity oils (3.0x10(exp -2) is less than Gamma(= Re/Ca) is less than 2.6x10(exp<br />

2)) is consistent with the success of the model in describing the interface shapes for these cases. We see that the inner scale parameters<br />

of these oils are velocity independent within our detectability limit. For our lowest viscosity oil (G=3.3x10(exp 4)), no model<br />

quantitatively describes the observed dependence of omega(sub o) versus Ca. Since we do not know if the inner scale physics for<br />

this oil has a significant velocity dependence, we cannot draw a firm conclusion on the moderate Re model. However, we note<br />

that the lowest viscosity oil evaporates <strong>and</strong> this could have an effect on inner scale mechanisms that results in a velocity dependence<br />

very different than higher viscosity oils with the same methyl termination. We have also studied the relaxation of contact<br />

line motion <strong>and</strong> dynamic contact angles after an abrupt change in the relative velocity of the solid surface <strong>and</strong> the fluid body. In<br />

these experiments, Ca remains small <strong>and</strong> Re = approximately 0 throughout the acceleration or deceleration of the contact line.<br />

We used a model of the relaxation of the dynamic contact line by assuming that the interface shape is quasi-static, with an apparent<br />

contact angle equal to the steady value at the instataneous contact line speed relative to the solid. Inertial effects are visible in our<br />

data for short times after the abrupt change in surface velocity. At these short times, we find that the viscous bending of the interface<br />

differs from that of a steadily moving contact line. Thus, we detect a deviation from Stokes flow in the intermediate region near<br />

the contact line at early times. At very short times (i.e., less than 1 s for the lesser viscous fluid, 1000 cPoise) the contact angle<br />

relaxation also disagrees with our quasi-static model. Later on after the abrupt change in surface velocity, the interface shape<br />

agrees with the predictions of the steady state model, indicating that the flow near the contact line has returned to Stokes flow,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the quasi-static model describes the contact line relaxation well. At long times, near the final steady state, the relaxation<br />

becomes exponential as expected near the final point. Our models work equally well for both accelerating <strong>and</strong> decelerating contact<br />

lines. The time scales both for the early time inertial regime <strong>and</strong> for the later quasi-static regime vary linearly with viscosity. However,<br />

these times scales do not differ for -OH <strong>and</strong> -CH3 terminated oils of the same viscosity even though these oils show very<br />

different steady state inner scale physics. Thus, the contact line relaxation we observe is likely due to viscous reorientation of the<br />

fluid motion in the intermediate <strong>and</strong> outer regions <strong>and</strong> not controlled by relaxation of inner scale hydrodynamic mechanisms.<br />

Author (revised)<br />

Inertia; Hydrodynamics; Steady State; Viscosity; Spreading<br />

<strong>2001</strong>00249<strong>39</strong> Washington State Univ., Dept. of Physics, Pullman, WA USA<br />

Liquid Bridge Stabilization with Acoustic Radiation <strong>and</strong> Maxwell Stress<br />

Marston, Phillip L., Washington State Univ., USA; Thiessen, David B., Washington State Univ., USA; Marr-Lyon, Mark J., Washington<br />

State Univ., USA; Proceedings of the Fifth Microgravity Fluid Physics <strong>and</strong> Transport Phenomena Conference; December<br />

2000, pp. 1079-1098; In English; See also <strong>2001</strong>0024890; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy; A10, Microfiche<br />

The stability of a liquid cylinder which bridges two solid cylinders has implications for the management of fluids in low-gravity.<br />

It is well known that a cylindrical liquid bridge in zero gravity becomes unstable <strong>and</strong> breaks when the length of the cylinder<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!