07.02.2013 Views

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 39 April 6, 2001

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 39 April 6, 2001

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 39 April 6, 2001

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Models for Aeroelastic Validation Research Involving Computation semi-span wind-tunnel model (MAVRIC-I), a business<br />

jet wing-fuselage flutter model, was tested in NASA Langley’s Transonic Dynamics Tunnel with the goal of obtaining experimental<br />

data suitable for Computational Aeroelasticity code validation at transonic separation onset conditions. This research<br />

model is notable for its inexpensive construction <strong>and</strong> instrumentation installation procedures. Unsteady pressures <strong>and</strong> wing<br />

responses were obtained for three wingtip configurations clean, tipstore, <strong>and</strong> winglet. Traditional flutter boundaries were measured<br />

over the range of M = 0.6 to 0.9 <strong>and</strong> maps of Limit Cycle Oscillation (LCO) behavior were made in the range of M = 0.85<br />

to 0.95. Effects of dynamic pressure <strong>and</strong> angle-of-attack were measured. Testing in both R134a heavy gas <strong>and</strong> air provided unique<br />

data on Reynolds number, transition effects, <strong>and</strong> the effect of speed of sound on LCO behavior. The data set provides excellent<br />

code validation test cases for the important class of flow conditions involving shock-induced transonic flow separation onset at<br />

low wing angles, including Limit Cycle Oscillation behavior.<br />

Author<br />

Flutter Analysis; Semispan Models; Wind Tunnel Models; Transonic Wind Tunnels; Aeroelasticity; Flutter<br />

09<br />

RESEARCH AND SUPPORT FACILITIES (AIR)<br />

�������� ��������� �������� �������� ��� �������� ������ ��� �������� ��������������� �������� ����� �������� ��� ����� ������������<br />

�������������� �������� ������ ���� ������� ���� �������� ������� ������ ��������� ��� �������� ��� ������� ������ ���������� ���<br />

�� ��� �������������� ��� ������� ��� ������������� ���������� ��� �� ������ ������� ������� ��� ���������� ��������<br />

<strong>2001</strong>00234<strong>39</strong> NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA USA<br />

Status of the National Transonic Facility Characterization (Invited)<br />

Bobbitt, C., Jr., NASA Langley Research Center, USA; Everhart, J., NASA Langley Research Center, USA; [<strong>2001</strong>]; 16p; In<br />

English; <strong>39</strong>th; <strong>Aerospace</strong> Sciences, 8-11 Jan. <strong>2001</strong>, Reno, NV, USA; Sponsored by American Inst. of Aeronautics <strong>and</strong> Astronautics,<br />

USA<br />

Report No.(s): AIAA Paper <strong>2001</strong>-0755; Copyright Waived; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy; A01, Microfiche<br />

This paper describes the current activities at the National Transonic Facility to document the test-section flow <strong>and</strong> to support<br />

tunnel improvements. The paper is divided into sections on the tunnel calibration, flow quality measurements, data quality assurance,<br />

<strong>and</strong> implementation of wall interference corrections.<br />

Author<br />

Transonic Wind Tunnels; Aerodynamic Interference; Wall Flow; Quality Control<br />

<strong>2001</strong>002<strong>39</strong>34 NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA USA<br />

Recent National Transonic Facility Test Process Improvements (Invited)<br />

Kilgore, W. A., NASA Langley Research Center, USA; Balakrishna, S., Vigyan Research Associates, Inc., USA; Bobbitt, C. W.,<br />

Jr., NASA Langley Research Center, USA; Adcock, J. B., Vigyan Research Associates, Inc., USA; [<strong>2001</strong>]; 12p; In English; <strong>39</strong>th;<br />

<strong>Aerospace</strong> Sciences, 8-11 Jan. <strong>2001</strong>, Reno, NV, USA; Sponsored by American Inst. of Aeronautics <strong>and</strong> Astronautics, USA<br />

Report No.(s): AIAA Paper <strong>2001</strong>-0756; Copyright Waived; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy; A01, Microfiche<br />

This paper describes the results of two recent process improvements; drag feed-forward Mach number control <strong>and</strong> simultaneous<br />

force/moment <strong>and</strong> pressure testing, at the National Transonic Facility. These improvements have reduced the duration <strong>and</strong><br />

cost of testing. The drag feed-forward Mach number control reduces the Mach number settling time by using measured model<br />

drag in the Mach number control algorithm. Simultaneous force/moment <strong>and</strong> pressure testing allows simultaneous collection of<br />

force/moment <strong>and</strong> pressure data without sacrificing data quality thereby reducing the overall testing time. Both improvements<br />

can be implemented at any wind tunnel. Additionally the NTF is working to develop <strong>and</strong> implement continuous pitch as a testing<br />

option as an additional method to reduce costs <strong>and</strong> maintain data quality.<br />

Author<br />

Transonic Wind Tunnels; Wind Tunnel Tests; Mach Number; Drag; Loads (Forces); Feedforward Control; Pressure Measurement<br />

<strong>2001</strong>0024168 Federal Aviation Administration, <strong>Technical</strong> Center, Atlantic City, NJ USA<br />

Team Processes in Airway Facilities Operations Control Centers<br />

Ahlstrom, Vicki, Federal Aviation Administration, USA; Koros, Anton, Federal Aviation Administration, USA; Helney, Michele,<br />

Federal Aviation Administration, USA; Jul. 2000; 32p; In English<br />

Report No.(s): AD-A385540; ACT-500; DOT/FAA/CT-TN00/14; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A01, Microfiche; A03, Hardcopy<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!