07.02.2013 Views

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 39 April 6, 2001

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 39 April 6, 2001

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 39 April 6, 2001

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Contract(s)/Grant(s): W-7405-eng-48; No Copyright; Avail: CPIA, 10630 Little Patuxent Pkwy., Suite 202, Columbia, MD<br />

21044-3200 HC<br />

A better underst<strong>and</strong>ing of thermal cook-off is important for safe h<strong>and</strong>ling <strong>and</strong> storing explosive devices. A number of safety<br />

issues exist about what occurs when a cased explosive thermally cooks off. For example, violence of the events as a function of<br />

confinement are important for predictions of collateral damage. This paper demonstrates how adjacent materials can be gauged<br />

to measure the resulting pressure wave <strong>and</strong> how this wave propagates in this adjacent material. The output pulse from the thermal<br />

cook-off explosive containing fixture is of obvious interest for assessing many scenarios.<br />

Author<br />

Pressure Measurement; Safety; Wave Propagation; Explosive Devices; Detonation Waves<br />

<strong>2001</strong>0025034 Lawrence Livermore National Lab., Livermore, CA USA<br />

Thermal Explosion Violence of HMX-Based Explosives: Effect of Composition, Confinement <strong>and</strong> Phase Transition Using<br />

the Scaled Thermal Explosive Experiment<br />

Maienschein, J. L., Lawrence Livermore National Lab., USA; Wardell, J. F., Lawrence Livermore National Lab., USA; Reaugh,<br />

J. E., Lawrence Livermore National Lab., USA; JANNAF 19th Propulsion Systems Hazards Subcommittee Meeting; November<br />

2000; <strong>Volume</strong> 1, pp. 83-93; In English; See also <strong>2001</strong>0025025<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): W-7405-eng-48; No Copyright; Avail: CPIA, 10630 Little Patuxent Pkwy., Suite 202, Columbia, MD<br />

21044-3200 HC<br />

We developed the Scaled Thermal Explosion Experiment (STEX) to provide a database of reaction violence from thermal<br />

explosion of explosives of interest. A cylinder of explosive, 1, 2 or 4 inches in diameter, is confined in a steel cylinder with heavy<br />

end caps, <strong>and</strong> heated under controlled conditions until it explodes. Reaction violence Is quantified by micropower radar measurement<br />

of the cylinder wall velocity, <strong>and</strong> by strain gauge data at reaction onset. Here we describe the test concept <strong>and</strong> design, show<br />

that the conditions are well understood, <strong>and</strong> present initial data with HMX-based explosives. The HMX results show that an explosive<br />

with high binder content yields less-violent reactions that an explosive with low binder content, <strong>and</strong> that the HMX phase at<br />

the time of explosion plays a key role in reaction violence.<br />

Author<br />

Explosions; Temperature Effects; Violence; Experiment Design; HMX<br />

<strong>2001</strong>0025035 Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board, Alex<strong>and</strong>ria, VA USA<br />

40 Tonne Event: A Comparison of Experimental Results <strong>and</strong> Risk Based Models<br />

Covino, Josephine, Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board, USA; Swisdak, Michael M., Jr., Naval Surface Warfare Center,<br />

USA; JANNAF 19th Propulsion Systems Hazards Subcommittee Meeting; November 2000; <strong>Volume</strong> 1, pp. 95-115; In<br />

English; See also <strong>2001</strong>0025025; No Copyright; Avail: CPIA, 10630 Little Patuxent Pkwy., Suite 202, Columbia, MD 21044-3200<br />

HC<br />

This paper summarizes the recent 40 tonne event completed in Australia. The airblast measurements are compared with the<br />

predictions of the DDESB Blast Effects Computer (BEC). The paper also provides an overview of the NATO quantitative Risk<br />

analysis results of the 40 tonne event. It outlines the basis of the setup <strong>and</strong> compares the risk based models results from Germany<br />

(GE), the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s (NL), Norway(NO), Switzerl<strong>and</strong> (CH), the UK (UK), <strong>and</strong> the USA (US).<br />

Author<br />

Shock Waves; Quantitative Analysis; Explosions<br />

<strong>2001</strong>0025036 Air Force Research Lab., Propulsion Directorate, Edwards AFB, CA USA<br />

Current Efforts to Develop Alternate Test Protocols for the Joint <strong>Technical</strong> Bulletin ”Department of Defense Ammunition<br />

<strong>and</strong> Explosives Hazard Classification Procedures” TB700-2, Dated 5 January, 1998<br />

Schwartz, Daniel F., Air Force Research Lab., USA; Bennett, Robert R., Thiokol Propulsion, USA; Graham, Kenneth J., Atlantic<br />

Research Corp., USA; Boggs, Thomas L., Naval Air Warfare Center, USA; JANNAF 19th Propulsion Systems Hazards Subcommittee<br />

Meeting; November 2000; <strong>Volume</strong> 1, pp. 117-152; In English; See also <strong>2001</strong>0025025<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): F04611-98-C-0003; F04611-98-C-0004; No Copyright; Avail: CPIA, 10630 Little Patuxent Pkwy., Suite<br />

202, Columbia, MD 21044-3200 HC<br />

When the Department of Defense (DoD) revised their <strong>Technical</strong> Bulletin (TB) 700-2, NAVSEAINST 8020.8B, TO 11A-1-47,<br />

DLAR 8220.12 hazard classification guidelines in January 1998, it significantly changed the procedures used to determine the<br />

explosive classification of rocket motors, to be shipped or placed in DoD storage facilities. The revised test protocols outlined<br />

in this document, (hereafter referred to as TB 700-2) were far more conservative <strong>and</strong> costly to implement than the previous ones.<br />

These changes will have a profound impact on the solid rocket community <strong>and</strong> in particular those involved with the research <strong>and</strong><br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!