14.02.2013 Views

TREBLINKA: - Holocaust Handbooks

TREBLINKA: - Holocaust Handbooks

TREBLINKA: - Holocaust Handbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter IV:<br />

The Alleged Extermination Facilities<br />

in Treblinka:<br />

An Historical and Technical Analysis<br />

1. Planning and Construction of the Eastern<br />

‘Extermination Camps’<br />

111<br />

The planning and construction of the so-called ‘extermination camps’<br />

Treblinka, Sobibór, and Be��ec, as reconstructed by the official historiography,<br />

raises serious problems, which have remained unsolved to the present.<br />

The chief problem consists in the absence of rational planning and in the unbelievably<br />

primitive architectural and technical structure of these camps,<br />

which stands in the strongest contrast to that of the others, especially of the socalled<br />

‘extermination camp’ Auschwitz. Raul Hilberg is one of the very few<br />

representatives of the orthodox historiography who have brought up the problem<br />

and sought to solve it. He explains: 276<br />

“Why three camps and not one? Why were they built one after the<br />

other, first Belzec, then Sobibor, and lastly Treblinka? Why in the beginning<br />

in each camp only three gas chambers, if they did not then suffice?<br />

One could be inclined to answer that the planners did not know the entire<br />

extent of their task, that they were groping their way toward the goal without<br />

having it in sight. That is not totally unimaginable, but it is certainly<br />

not the whole explanation and perhaps not even the most important. It was<br />

a matter of, in short, a difficult administrative problem.<br />

The Third Reich had neither a particular central authority nor its own<br />

budgetary title for a ‘Final Solution to the Jewish Problem.’ The construction<br />

of the camps, the positions for guard staff, and the management of<br />

transports all had to be financed in a complex manner. Auschwitz II and<br />

Lublin, for example, were designated in the beginning as camps for prisoners<br />

of war of the SS, and indeed not only for camouflage but for budgetary<br />

reasons. Belzec, Sobibor, and Treblinka, on the other hand, were plain and<br />

simple killing camps. But they could not be operated that way under any<br />

276 Raul Hilberg, “Die Aktion Reinhard,” in: Eberhard Jäckel, Jürgen Rohwer (eds.), Der Mord<br />

an den Juden im Zweiten Weltkrieg, Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, Stuttgart 1985, pp. 129f.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!