14.02.2013 Views

TREBLINKA: - Holocaust Handbooks

TREBLINKA: - Holocaust Handbooks

TREBLINKA: - Holocaust Handbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter III: Investigations, Camp Plans, Statistics 93<br />

bombing the camp. In the first place there was nothing left to destroy, and in<br />

the second, the craters produced by the bombs would have revealed the traces<br />

of the alleged mass murders. An aerial photograph of the camp Treblinka II<br />

taken in November 1944 further reveals that the camp at that time – after the<br />

area was taken by the Red Army – had not yet been bombed. 219<br />

Thus, the bombardment must have been the work of the Soviets. But the<br />

Treblinka camp had already been liquidated in November 1943, and there<br />

were no military targets in its immediate vicinity. Treblinka I, which was still<br />

in operation in May 1944, was not bombed. Why, therefore, did the Soviets<br />

drop bombs on Treblinka II? Perhaps in order to obliterate the many traces left<br />

behind by the SS, traces which could in no way be made to jibe with the thesis<br />

of mass extermination, and to lay false tracks that seemed to confirm this thesis?<br />

228<br />

As far as the shape and size of the camp is concerned, one may regard the<br />

plans of the camp mentioned above as reliable, since they were drawn by a<br />

professional surveyor on the basis of measurements done at the site, and because<br />

they correspond well to the aerial photographs. One can therefore accept<br />

them as a standard for comparison for all plans drawn earlier or later by exprisoners<br />

of the camp or based upon their descriptions. With one exception,<br />

which will be discussed later, the camp continually shows the shape of an irregular<br />

quadrilateral.<br />

On the other hand, with regard to the buildings in the camp and other facilities<br />

we are dependent entirely upon the statements of the witnesses, since<br />

not a single German camp plan has been preserved. The differences between<br />

the plans produced by former inmates are less revealing than the graphical development<br />

of the so-called ‘Camp II’, thus of the alleged extermination camp.<br />

On the plan, which was included with the report of November 15, 1942, 229<br />

the entire camp is dominated by the two extermination facilities, as if the<br />

‘Camp I’, the administrative sector with quarters, kitchens, storehouses etc.,<br />

did not exist at all. The two steam execution installations with three or, respectively,<br />

ten chambers, which were then transformed into engine exhaust gas<br />

execution facilities by J. Wiernik on the map published in his writings of<br />

1944, 230 appear in all later plans with the same shape and in the same location.<br />

231 Thus, in the beginning, ‘Camp I’ was not depicted at all, and ‘Camp II’<br />

consisted exclusively of the two death houses.<br />

The first official plan of Treblinka was produced by the Soviet investigative<br />

commission on September 24, 1944. It has the shape of an irregular quadrilateral,<br />

which corresponds to the actual form of the camp only in rough fea-<br />

228<br />

The body parts found on the camp grounds by the Poles are rationally explainable only by<br />

bomb explosions.<br />

229<br />

See Document 2 in the Appendix.<br />

230<br />

Cf. Chapter II, Section 5.<br />

231<br />

See Document 4 in the Appendix.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!