TREBLINKA: - Holocaust Handbooks

306 Carlo Mattogno, Jürgen Graf: Treblinka
There is no doubt that the camp at Risiera di San Sabba was not an ‘extermination
camp,’ and it is also clear that the main activity of Globocnik’s unit
“R” was to fight partisans. Therefore, we have clear proof of deployment of
the former staff of both euthanasia and Operation Reinhardt in a task that had
nothing to do with the extermination of Jews. Thus, the fact of partial continuity
of the personnel employed in the euthanasia with that employed in the Operation
Reinhardt does not permit the conclusion that Jews were summarily
exterminated in the Operation Reinhardt camps.
Moreover, Meyer’s claim that not only the euthanasia staff was transferred,
but also their methods and equipment (gassing with carbon monoxide), is
simply wrong. There is no evidence that the method used for killings during
the euthanasia program – mainly bottled carbon monoxide – was ever used
during the alleged Holocaust. Here we find claims to all sorts of methods, except
the one used during euthanasia, which had proven to be highly effective.
Today, Meyer and his fellow dogmatists claim that the exhaust of diesel engines
was used to kill people in Treblinka and Be��ec. Fritz Berg has shown in
detail how absurd this claim is, indeed. 99 It is not only absurd because diesel
exhaust gases hardly contain any carbon monoxide, but even more so because
the Germans had an overabundance of extremely poisonous devices available:
hundred thousands of wood and coke gas generators, which were cheap and
easy to operate and delivered a gas just as lethal as bottled carbon monoxide.
Considering that some of the staff of Operation Reinhardt had knowledge
of homicidal techniques from the euthanasia program, this lack of transfer of
method is strong circumstantial evidence that the Operation Reinhardt did not
mean the killing of people.
2. Archaeological Findings
Meyer criticizes the alleged lack of discussion of archaeological findings,
such as the fact that today the rain still rinses bone fragments to the surface.
Since archaeological findings are discussed in detail in Chapter III.2. of the
present book, one wonders if Meyer really read this book thoroughly. Also,
when talking about archaeology, Meyer should first ask why the huge mass
graves attested to by the witnesses were never found despite archaeological
research. Bone fragments rinsed to the surface prove that people died in Treblinka
and were buried, a fact that nobody denies, but such findings do not
prove a mass murder with the methods and the order of magnitude claimed.
Unless Meyer has established the extent and nature of bone fragments and of
the area, in which they can be found, his statement cannot be called an archaeological
finding, but merely an unfounded claim.