30.01.2015 Views

sessione 2.3 - Ogs

sessione 2.3 - Ogs

sessione 2.3 - Ogs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GNGTS 2009 SESSIONE <strong>2.3</strong><br />

Fig. 4 - Comparison<br />

between the results<br />

obtained by the low<br />

and high frequency<br />

simulations in terms<br />

of PGA and PGV<br />

assuming different<br />

hypocentre locations<br />

for each fault: a)<br />

Western Liguria; b)<br />

Western Alps; c)<br />

Monferrato.<br />

kinematic rupture with a rake angle of 135 degree and the hypocentre represented by a star in Fig.<br />

3 yields the worst shaking scenario illustrated in Fig. 3. The Fourier spectra obtained by the two<br />

procedures are complementary, with a range of superimposition between 0.2 and 0.6 Hz. After this<br />

range, GRFLT12S results start to decay significantly. The S-waves contributions computed by the<br />

two methods are in agreement, both in terms of wave arrival and peak amplitude. In terms of time<br />

histories, while in the GRFLT12S traces the arrivals of P and S waves can be clearly distinguished,<br />

EXSIM reproduces the S waves only, as expected.<br />

A total of 144 low frequency and 50 high frequency simulations have been computed to define<br />

the deterministic worst ground shaking scenarios. In Fig. 4 the numerical results are summarised in<br />

terms of horizontal Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) and Peak Ground Velocity (PGV) relative to<br />

the worst scenarios computed for each fault, assuming different hypocentre locations. As expected,<br />

high frequency simulations predict larger values of ground shaking if compared with the low frequency<br />

results. The difference of the ground motion parameters estimated by the two methods<br />

increases by increasing the magnitude of the event. GRFLT12S correctly simulates the directivity<br />

effects, ignored by EXSIM. The Western Liguria event generates the largest PGA and PGV values<br />

of 0.06 g and 0.065 m/s respectively. Similar values of maximum PGV of ~0.02 m/s and PGA of<br />

~0.02 g have been calculated for both the Western Alps and Monferrato events.<br />

Acknowledgements. The present contribution has been developed in the framework the research contract<br />

undersigned with the Administration of Vicoforte Sanctuary for the monitoring and survey of the “Monte<br />

Regalis Basilica”, with the support of the Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Cuneo. The authors would like to<br />

extend their gratitude to Prof. Mario Alberto Chiorino, Coordinator of the Program (Politecnico di Torino) and<br />

to the Administration of the Sanctuary.<br />

References.<br />

Hisada Y. & Bielak J. [2003], A theoretical method for computing near fault ground motion in a layered half-spaces considering<br />

static offset due a surface faulting, with a physical interpretation of fling step and rupture directivity, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am,.<br />

93 (3), 1154-1168.<br />

Lai C.G, Corigliano M., Sánchez H., Scandella L. [2009], Definition of seismic input at the “Regina Montis Regalis” Basilica of<br />

Vicoforte, Northern Italy, in press by IUSS press<br />

Motazedian D. and Atkinson, G. [2005], Stochastic Finite-Fault Modeling Based on a Dynamic Corner Frequency, Bulletin of the<br />

Seismological Society of America, 995-1010.<br />

489

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!