A Semi-Implicit, Three-Dimensional Model for Estuarine ... - USGS
A Semi-Implicit, Three-Dimensional Model for Estuarine ... - USGS
A Semi-Implicit, Three-Dimensional Model for Estuarine ... - USGS
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
50 A <strong>Semi</strong>-<strong>Implicit</strong>, <strong>Three</strong>-<strong>Dimensional</strong> <strong>Model</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Estuarine</strong> Circulation<br />
gradient, and Coriolis terms. The governing equations <strong>for</strong> use with orthogonal grids are significantly less complex that those <strong>for</strong><br />
nonorthogonal grids, but they still include extra terms that represent the curvature of the coordinate system. Owing to the extra<br />
terms, the computational time that is required in solving the nonorthogonal curvilinear equations is approximately double that<br />
required <strong>for</strong> solving the Cartesian equations (Spaulding, 1984). Solving the orthogonal curvilinear equations requires approxi-<br />
mately 25 percent greater computational time than the Cartesian equations (A.F. Blumberg, oral commun., 1995). Ideally the<br />
savings from any reduction in the number of grid points that is made possible by using a curvilinear model should be sufficient to<br />
compensate <strong>for</strong> the greater cost of the calculations <strong>for</strong> individual grid points. For a nonorthogonal curvilinear model in particular,<br />
that is not always possible. In these instances, the benefits from the greater flexibility in the placement of grid points using a non-<br />
orthogonal curvilinear model must outweigh the greater computational cost of the model, or a Cartesian or orthogonal-curvilinear<br />
model should be used.<br />
James R<br />
York R<br />
Rappahannock R<br />
Potomac R<br />
Patuxent R<br />
Choptank R<br />
Patapsco R<br />
Figure 2.11. Nonorthogonal curvilinear grid used by Johnson and others (1991, 1993) to model Chesapeake Bay.<br />
(Modified from Johnson and others, 1991, fig. 2.)<br />
Susquehanna R<br />
C&D Canal<br />
N