28.02.2013 Views

A Semi-Implicit, Three-Dimensional Model for Estuarine ... - USGS

A Semi-Implicit, Three-Dimensional Model for Estuarine ... - USGS

A Semi-Implicit, Three-Dimensional Model for Estuarine ... - USGS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. Layer Averaging the Governing Equations 67<br />

which is very similar in <strong>for</strong>m to the momentum acceleration terms expressed by 3.28 and 3.29. Equation 3.53 is valid <strong>for</strong> all layers<br />

subject to the boundary conditions of ( ws)<br />

1⁄ = ( ws)<br />

2 km + 1⁄ = 0 , which cause the kinematic conditions at the free surface and the<br />

2<br />

bottom of the water column to be satisfied; the kinematic conditions prevent the advective flux of salt through the boundaries.<br />

Integration of the turbulent diffusion terms in equation 3.5 results in<br />

1 ∂(<br />

hJx) ∂(<br />

hJ-----<br />

k y)<br />

⎛ k<br />

----------------- + ----------------- + ( J<br />

ρ0 ∂x<br />

∂y<br />

z)<br />

– ( J<br />

k – 1⁄ z)<br />

⎞ , (3.54)<br />

⎝ 2 k + 1⁄ 2⎠<br />

which is subject to the boundary conditions of no turbulent salt flux at the water column free surface and bottom; this condition is<br />

en<strong>for</strong>ced by setting27 Jz = J<br />

⁄ z = 0 . Substituting the concept of a horizontal eddy diffusivity in the <strong>for</strong>m<br />

+ ⁄<br />

into 3.54 results in<br />

( ) 1 2<br />

( ) km 1 2<br />

( Jx) k<br />

ρ ⎛ ∂s<br />

0 D ---- ⎞<br />

∂s<br />

=<br />

⎝ H ( J<br />

∂x⎠<br />

y)<br />

= ρ ⎛<br />

k 0 D ---- ⎞<br />

H<br />

(3.55)<br />

k<br />

⎝ ∂y⎠k<br />

∂<br />

---- D<br />

∂x<br />

Hh s ∂ ⎛ ---- ⎞ ∂<br />

---- D<br />

⎝ ∂x⎠k∂y<br />

Hh s ∂ ( J<br />

⎛ ---- ⎞ z)<br />

k 1 ( J<br />

– ⁄ 2 z)<br />

k + 1<br />

2<br />

+ + ------------------- – ------------------- ⁄<br />

(3.56)<br />

⎝ ∂y⎠kρ0<br />

ρ0 which is the final <strong>for</strong>m of the layer-averaged turbulent salt flux terms. The <strong>for</strong>m of 3.56 is close to that of the layer-averaged<br />

turbulent stress terms in the momentum equations expressed by 3.51 and 3.52.<br />

The two integral terms in equation 3.53 are salt dispersion terms representing advective fluxes of salt in the x- and y-directions<br />

caused by vertical non-uni<strong>for</strong>mities of the velocity and salinity over a layer. If the 3-D velocity and salt concentration do not vary<br />

with z over a layer, these terms will vanish. In general, if layer heights are small enough to avoid a large change in velocity and<br />

salinity across the layers, these terms will be small. Here these terms will be dropped. If <strong>for</strong> a certain application these terms are<br />

significant, the magnitude of D H can be adjusted.<br />

27 The conditions of no turbulent flux of salt at the water column free surface and bottom are <strong>for</strong>mally represented by<br />

and<br />

∂z<br />

1⁄ ∂z<br />

1<br />

2<br />

0 ( Jx) ---------<br />

⁄ 2<br />

= – – ( J 1⁄ 2 ∂x<br />

y)<br />

--------- + J 1⁄ 2 ∂y<br />

z<br />

( ) 1⁄ 2<br />

∂zkm<br />

+ 1⁄ ∂z<br />

2<br />

km + 1⁄ 2<br />

0 = – ( Jx) ------------------- – ( J<br />

km + 1⁄ 2 ∂x<br />

y)<br />

------------------- + ( J<br />

km + 1⁄ 2 ∂y<br />

z)<br />

.<br />

km + 1⁄ 2<br />

Because the terms involving the boundary slopes are already eliminated in 3.54, the conditions are satisfied simply by requiring that<br />

( Jz) = ( J 1⁄ z)<br />

= 0 in 3.56.<br />

2 km + 1⁄ 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!