28.02.2013 Views

A Semi-Implicit, Three-Dimensional Model for Estuarine ... - USGS

A Semi-Implicit, Three-Dimensional Model for Estuarine ... - USGS

A Semi-Implicit, Three-Dimensional Model for Estuarine ... - USGS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. Layer Averaging the Governing Equations<br />

3.1 Introduction<br />

3. Layer Averaging the Governing Equations 55<br />

The present model is based on a z-coordinate system, as discussed in section 2.6.2. The grid system that is used in solving the<br />

model equations is composed of layers, as is illustrated in figure 3.1. Because the interfaces between the layers are level planes,<br />

this kind of model is sometimes called a multilevel model (Liu and Leendertse, 1978) to distinguish it from a multilayer model<br />

which is more commonly used to identify a density-coordinate model. Because both multilevel and multilayer models are based<br />

on the concept of layers, Cheng and others (1976) referred to both types of models as multilayer models but labeled them as Type I<br />

and Type II models, respectively.<br />

The hydrodynamic variables usually change considerably over the depth of an estuarine flow. In order to base the model computations<br />

on mass and momentum fluxes in the different layers, it is necessary to prepare the governing equations <strong>for</strong> the finitedifference<br />

method by integrating them over the height of each layer. By choosing the layer-integrated, volumetric transports as<br />

dependent variables, this approach will insure that the model equations are in a conservative <strong>for</strong>m. One advantage of this <strong>for</strong>m is<br />

that the depth-integrated continuity equation is linear. If primitive variables were used, terms involving products of the layer thicknesses<br />

and the horizontal velocity components would appear in the discrete <strong>for</strong>m of the depth-integrated continuity equation; when<br />

the time-varying surface layer thickness and the surface velocity components are out of phase (as is typical of a standing wave),<br />

the calculations <strong>for</strong> these terms are susceptible to phase errors and amplitude errors. Another benefit of integrating the governing<br />

equations over layers is that the equations <strong>for</strong> a single-layer system reduce to a conservative <strong>for</strong>m of the 2-D vertically averaged<br />

equations; thus in an area of shallow water where only one layer is required, the 3-D model becomes automatically a 2-D model<br />

without any modifications to the model coding.<br />

The procedure <strong>for</strong> layer averaging the 3-D governing equations of Chapter 2 is defined in some detail in Chapter 3. Very few<br />

approximations are made; the set of model equations <strong>for</strong> a layered system that is the result is fully three-dimensional. The <strong>for</strong>m of<br />

the layer-averaged equations is similar to that first presented by Leendertse and others (1973).<br />

The starting point is the 3-D equations in approximately the <strong>for</strong>m of equations 2.38 to 2.42 with the turbulent stresses represented<br />

by τxx = – ρ0u′u′ , τxy = – ρ0u′v′ , τxz = – ρ0u′w′ , τyx = – ρ0v′u′ , τyy = – ρ0v′v′ , and τyz = – ρ0v′w′ ,<br />

and the turbulent salt fluxes represented by Jx = – ρ0u′s′ , Jy = – ρ0v′s′ , and Jz = – ρ0w′s′ . The introduction of the eddy viscosity<br />

and eddy diffusivity will come in a later step. The 3-D equations in the appropriate <strong>for</strong>m are

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!