28.02.2013 Views

A Semi-Implicit, Three-Dimensional Model for Estuarine ... - USGS

A Semi-Implicit, Three-Dimensional Model for Estuarine ... - USGS

A Semi-Implicit, Three-Dimensional Model for Estuarine ... - USGS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

52 A <strong>Semi</strong>-<strong>Implicit</strong>, <strong>Three</strong>-<strong>Dimensional</strong> <strong>Model</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Estuarine</strong> Circulation<br />

The second type of vertical coordinate system uses density to replace depth (z) as the vertical coordinate, making density an<br />

independent variable in the trans<strong>for</strong>med system (x, y, ρ, t). The coordinate z becomes a dependent variable that identifies the depth<br />

at which the density is defined <strong>for</strong> a given x, y location and time t. The governing equations are schematized by using stacked layers<br />

of uni<strong>for</strong>m density separated by moving, impermeable interfaces. The locations of the interfaces are defined as<br />

z k = ζ k (x, y, t), k = 1, km <strong>for</strong> a system of km layers, as illustrated in figure 2.12. In the general case, the layers are coupled at the<br />

interfaces through internal friction (momentum transfer), although layered models of seiching in lakes and ocean flows having<br />

small vertical Ekman numbers are often used without friction and give satisfactory results. In layered models, a new function P is<br />

a substitute <strong>for</strong> the hydrostatic pressure p. It is called the Montgomery potential, defined as (Cushman-Roisin, 1994, p. 171)<br />

P = p+ ρgz .<br />

The horizontal pressure gradients ∂p/∂x and ∂p/∂y, evaluated at constant z, become ∂P/∂x and ∂P/∂y when evaluated at constant ρ.<br />

The density-coordinate models are generally referred to as multilayer models (<strong>for</strong> example, Laevastu, 1975; Liu and Leen-<br />

dertse, 1978) or isopycnic models (<strong>for</strong> example, Bleck and Boudra, 1981, 1986; Boudra and others, 1987). They are appealing <strong>for</strong><br />

their relatively simplified mathematics and conceptually realistic approach. They are not, however, well suited to estuarine mod-<br />

eling, which includes a density structure and estuarine geometry that are typically very complicated. In estuaries, the pycnoclines<br />

(constant density surfaces) deviate considerably from the horizontal and tend to converge toward one another and to intersect reg-<br />

ularly with the surface and bottom boundaries. Upwelling and downwelling flows can also occur. These situations cause severe<br />

numerical difficulties <strong>for</strong> multilayer models, as the layers must then be permitted to converge, collapse, and reappear. Bleck and<br />

Boudra (1986) have made progress in dealing with the impediments of multilayer modeling by developing an isopycnic model<br />

z<br />

y<br />

x<br />

ρ 1<br />

ρ 2<br />

.<br />

.<br />

.<br />

ρ km<br />

Figure 2.12. Sketch of a multilayered system.<br />

ζ<br />

ζ 1<br />

ζ 2<br />

ζ km–1<br />

ζ km<br />

k = 1<br />

k = 2<br />

=<br />

–<br />

k = km<br />

h ( x , y )

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!