CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas
CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas
CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
But compromising over chemtrails surrendered the entire bill After looking at the replacement bill, Dr.<br />
Len Horowitz protested: “In the new bill, however, all of these protections were removed leaving citizens<br />
susceptible to control and attack with such “exotic weapons systems” directed by agencies and<br />
organizations” detailed in his extensively documented books.<br />
Congressman Kucinich deserved major kudos for putting “chemtrails” on the Congressional agenda.<br />
After years of being called “hoaxers” and “UFO nuts”, people who knew that what they are seeing,<br />
smelling, sampling and photographing is real could take heart that chemtrails are finally, officially on the<br />
Congressional record. No amendments have been made to the original HR-2977. Technically, this bill<br />
still exists. It remains in “referral” limbo before the same Science Committee whose protest led to its<br />
hasty withdrawal. HR-2977 can be revived at any time.<br />
MYSTERY OF THE MISSING CHEMTRAILS LEGISLATION<br />
Kucinich’s bid to make chemtrails illegal did not make the evening news. As Bob Fitrakis later told me,<br />
“Sources close to Kucinich’s new bill, HR 3616, which has been endorsed by some 254 community<br />
groups throughout the nation, say that the term ‘chemtrail’ was dropped because Kucinich couldn’t get<br />
the Union of Concerned Scientists or the Federation of American Scientists to sign on.”<br />
Fitrakis later learned that international symposiums on changing the atmosphere of planets such as<br />
Mars – a process called terraforming – have engaged in active discussions since at least 1955.<br />
“DEEP SKY” MAKES SOME CALLS<br />
Less than three months after the traumatic events of<br />
September 11, the senior Air Traffic Control manager known<br />
as “Deep Sky” was becoming increasingly worried.<br />
Unlike himself, his family did not work in the air-filtered<br />
confines of a windowless building. They were still<br />
experiencing health problems. His wife, who had never<br />
experienced allergies, suffered from episodes of Sudden<br />
Onset Acute Asthma whose occurrences exactly matched<br />
the increased aerial activity he was seeing on his scopes.<br />
Deep Sky began calling his colleagues at FAA flight centers<br />
across the United States. Were they seeing something in the<br />
air that was degrading their radarscopes? What were they<br />
being told?<br />
Chicago’s O’Hare Field is still the busiest airport in America. Controllers there, as well as all three New<br />
York airports, LA’s LAX, San Francisco, Jacksonville, Cleveland, San Diego, Dulles, Washington DC<br />
and “the big one” in Atlanta (the biggest airport in the nation) – all responded. Without exception, these<br />
air traffic controllers told Deep Sky they were still seeing formations of air force tankers on their scopes.<br />
So were tower personnel at smaller airports like Westchester County in Armonk, New York and<br />
Manchester, New Hampshire.<br />
The controllers contacted by Deep Sky also unanimously reported that they were being told to divert<br />
commercial traffic below unusual formations of air force tankers flying strange patterns – described by<br />
their superiors as “routine”. Controllers across the U.S. were being told that unspecified “experiments<br />
with radar” could degrade their own displays. Controllers told Deep Sky they had never seen so much<br />
“clutter” or manmade “cloudiness” obscuring their scopes.