02.03.2013 Views

CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas

CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas

CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

But compromising over chemtrails surrendered the entire bill After looking at the replacement bill, Dr.<br />

Len Horowitz protested: “In the new bill, however, all of these protections were removed leaving citizens<br />

susceptible to control and attack with such “exotic weapons systems” directed by agencies and<br />

organizations” detailed in his extensively documented books.<br />

Congressman Kucinich deserved major kudos for putting “chemtrails” on the Congressional agenda.<br />

After years of being called “hoaxers” and “UFO nuts”, people who knew that what they are seeing,<br />

smelling, sampling and photographing is real could take heart that chemtrails are finally, officially on the<br />

Congressional record. No amendments have been made to the original HR-2977. Technically, this bill<br />

still exists. It remains in “referral” limbo before the same Science Committee whose protest led to its<br />

hasty withdrawal. HR-2977 can be revived at any time.<br />

MYSTERY OF THE MISSING CHEMTRAILS LEGISLATION<br />

Kucinich’s bid to make chemtrails illegal did not make the evening news. As Bob Fitrakis later told me,<br />

“Sources close to Kucinich’s new bill, HR 3616, which has been endorsed by some 254 community<br />

groups throughout the nation, say that the term ‘chemtrail’ was dropped because Kucinich couldn’t get<br />

the Union of Concerned Scientists or the Federation of American Scientists to sign on.”<br />

Fitrakis later learned that international symposiums on changing the atmosphere of planets such as<br />

Mars – a process called terraforming – have engaged in active discussions since at least 1955.<br />

“DEEP SKY” MAKES SOME CALLS<br />

Less than three months after the traumatic events of<br />

September 11, the senior Air Traffic Control manager known<br />

as “Deep Sky” was becoming increasingly worried.<br />

Unlike himself, his family did not work in the air-filtered<br />

confines of a windowless building. They were still<br />

experiencing health problems. His wife, who had never<br />

experienced allergies, suffered from episodes of Sudden<br />

Onset Acute Asthma whose occurrences exactly matched<br />

the increased aerial activity he was seeing on his scopes.<br />

Deep Sky began calling his colleagues at FAA flight centers<br />

across the United States. Were they seeing something in the<br />

air that was degrading their radarscopes? What were they<br />

being told?<br />

Chicago’s O’Hare Field is still the busiest airport in America. Controllers there, as well as all three New<br />

York airports, LA’s LAX, San Francisco, Jacksonville, Cleveland, San Diego, Dulles, Washington DC<br />

and “the big one” in Atlanta (the biggest airport in the nation) – all responded. Without exception, these<br />

air traffic controllers told Deep Sky they were still seeing formations of air force tankers on their scopes.<br />

So were tower personnel at smaller airports like Westchester County in Armonk, New York and<br />

Manchester, New Hampshire.<br />

The controllers contacted by Deep Sky also unanimously reported that they were being told to divert<br />

commercial traffic below unusual formations of air force tankers flying strange patterns – described by<br />

their superiors as “routine”. Controllers across the U.S. were being told that unspecified “experiments<br />

with radar” could degrade their own displays. Controllers told Deep Sky they had never seen so much<br />

“clutter” or manmade “cloudiness” obscuring their scopes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!