02.03.2013 Views

CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas

CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas

CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Though no noise complaints have ever been received in connection with whisper-quiet chemtrails,<br />

Lieber recommended that reports concerning unusual airplane activity be sent in writing to the Noise<br />

Ombudsman in Washington, DC.<br />

SPOOKING THE SPIN-MASTERS<br />

Was this “file-a-noise-complaint” response a cover-up for clandestine flights in which airspace was being<br />

cleared by the FAA and therefore required no flight plans to be filed?<br />

When a Toronto chemtrail observer called the Pearson International Airport authority in the spring of ‘99,<br />

he was startled to hear “an obvious military voice” on the phone. Pretending to be an airplane buff, the<br />

caller excitedly asked where the air show was.<br />

The airport authority was taken off guard. “There’s no air show today,” he stammered.<br />

“Well,” the caller responded, “I’m watching KC-10’s and KC-135s painting low contrails over the West<br />

end of Toronto. I’m looking at them right now.”<br />

“Contrails!” The official was clearly taken aback, almost shouting the word “I have no information on<br />

that!”<br />

To the caller he actually sounded scared…before giving out the FAA number for noise control.<br />

EARLY CHRISTMAS<br />

Perhaps the most ludicrous official response came in March 1999 when a Michigan caller complained of<br />

three bouts of illness suffered by him and his girlfriend after heavy chemtrail activity. An FAA<br />

representative calmly explained the unusual aerial activity as “delayed Christmas traffic.”<br />

THE AIR FORCE RESPONDS AGAIN AGAIN<br />

“The air force doesn’t do anything that emits anything other than a normal contrail, which is vapor,” U.S.<br />

Air Force spokeswoman Margaret Gidding informed the Spokesman-Review of Spokane, Washington in<br />

November, 1999.<br />

So was her story.<br />

USAF CALLS CHEMTRAILS, A “HOAX”<br />

Two years after their initial denials, an October 2001 public disinformation paper released by the United<br />

State Air Force called chemtrails a “hoax” perpetrated by people confused over contrails. According to<br />

this new spin: “The ‘Chemtrail’ hoax has been investigated and refuted by many established and<br />

accredited universities, scientific organizations, and major media publications” – who were either<br />

ordered or volunteering to avoid compromising national security.<br />

“The Air Force is not conducting any weather modification experiments or programs and has no plans to<br />

do so in the future,” the official statement concluded. This was an even bigger whopper, considering the<br />

activation of weather-altering HAARP and other atmospheric experiments ongoing since the late 1940s.<br />

[aia.lackland.af.mil]<br />

With Project Storm Fury and Vietnam’s “Operation Popeye” under its wings, the United States Air Force<br />

continued to be very much into weather modification – as it claimed on another official website:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!