02.03.2013 Views

CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas

CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas

CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

It looked synthetic. Suspecting aerial antecedents, Margie ran back to the house to fetch a pair of<br />

microscope slides. After collecting slide samples, two very long pieces remained. Heedless of health<br />

hazards, “I grabbed both and they flowed behind me as I walked up the driveway.”<br />

When she examined her finds under the microscope, the snipped strands had recoiled into corkscrews<br />

and matted together. After teasing it apart, she found that what looked like a single submicron strand<br />

was really composed of two or more strands woven together.<br />

In November, she wrote to Professor Brian Spratt at the Department of Infectious Disease<br />

Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, St. Mary’s Hospital, London after reading about his<br />

work in a newspaper story.<br />

“Dear Professor Brian Spratt,” Margie wrote, “All across the country we are experiencing dense amounts<br />

of spider silk, whether natural or synthetic, falling from the sky and draping itself over everything I have<br />

collected a number of samples and had sent one off for an Infrared Analysis:<br />

The Institute that I sent it to concluded that it was natural spider silk. They compared the Infrared<br />

A of my sample to one of known spider silk done by some company in Japan. The two<br />

spectrographs were similar but not identical. I got a second opinion from a biology teacher who<br />

worked in a lab and he stated twice that he thought the sample was synthetic. He pointed out to<br />

me that the spectrographs were not identical.<br />

In trying to be rational about all this, I thought to myself, I know they are making synthetic spider<br />

silk so it follows that they would use similar components to the real thing. I would assume this<br />

would also mean that the spectrographs would also be similar. There are never any spiders seen<br />

clinging to these strands from the sky.<br />

My sample has a very artificial looking corkscrew quality. I looked at it under my microscope and<br />

compared it to known spider webs and there was no similarity. My strands were much thicker<br />

and were composed of what appeared to be many submicron strands bundled together.<br />

People are reporting sickness after touching these strands. I myself became strangely ill about<br />

four days after playing with it under the microscope however it could have been coincidence. I<br />

would be very much appreciative if you could share any knowledge you may have on this<br />

subject. I feel that all the different types of experimentation that are taking place at every level of<br />

our atmosphere, must be affecting our health and the public has a right to know what they are<br />

breathing and also how they are being affected electromagnetically.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!