02.03.2013 Views

CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas

CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas

CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

As Lou and S.T. completed their errands, the jets kept them company, leaving lines and circles that<br />

resembled smoke rings. Even living near Kennedy, LaGuardia and Newark jetports, Aubuchont had<br />

never seen so many big jets performing identical maneuvers in the same sky.<br />

When they returned to Parsonsfield around four, the lines were starting to merge into a dingy haze.<br />

Richard Dean called back. After receiving ST’s message, the assistant WMWV news director had gone<br />

outside with other news staff and counted 370 lines in skies usually devoid of aerial activity.<br />

Brendt put in another call to the FAA official. He had never heard of chemtrails. But similar military<br />

activities were ongoing in other regions. His radars showed the aircraft – which he identified as U.S. Air<br />

Force tankers – flying north into Canada…<br />

Brendt’s “Deep Sky” source later agreed to go on record. In taped three interviews with this veteran<br />

radio reporter – two of which took place before witnesses at WMWV - the senior Air Traffic Control<br />

manager repeated and developed, “for the record” the information he initially relayed to Brendt in their<br />

initial phone conversation. He also answered specific questions relayed from this writer.<br />

CLICK HERE FOR ‘DEEP SKY” INTERVIEW<br />

The following press release went out to all major print and broadcast media across Canada and the<br />

USA:<br />

FAA OFFICIAL CONFIRMS AIR FORCE CONDUCTING WEATHER MODIFICATION OVER U.S. AND<br />

CANADA<br />

by William Thomas and S.T. Brendt<br />

PORTLAND, Maine (March, 2001) A senior air traffic control manager responsible for<br />

commercial aircraft over the northeastern United States has confirmed in a second exclusive<br />

interview with radio reporter S.T. Brendt that large formations of U.S. Air Force tanker aircraft are<br />

conducting ongoing operations over the USA and Canada.<br />

The sky-obscuring chemicals laid down in crisscross patterns by the big jets have been observed<br />

by thousands of eyewitnesses across North America over the past two years. In a corroborative<br />

statement, a Canadian Airport Authority for airport planning and environment at Victoria<br />

International Airport confirmed on December 8, 2000 that grid patterns and X’s laid by tanker<br />

aircraft over the British Columbia capitol on December 7 was “a joint U.S.-Canadian military<br />

operation.”<br />

When asked the purpose of these missions, the FAA official said he was told “weather<br />

modification” after a “higher civil authority” ordered him to divert incoming trans-Atlantic airliners<br />

around military formations flying over 37,000 feet on March 12, 20 and 21, 2001.<br />

On Monday, March 12, reporter Brendt and her partner Lou Aubuchont counted 30 aircraft laying<br />

down a lingering gridwork of several hundred plumes between 12:05 and 12:55 p.m. Aubuchont,<br />

who witnessed many military maneuvers during his stint as a courier in U.S. Navy Intelligence,<br />

said he had never seen anything like it.<br />

“It looked like an invasion,” he told this reporter. Aubuchont emphasized that unlike aerial battle<br />

exercises, the tankers were unescorted by combat helicopters or fighter jets. “It was just<br />

tankers.”<br />

After being contacted at a major metropolitan airport by Brendt, the ATC manager drove to her<br />

home on Monday; March 26 to see for himself how many commercial jets would be visible from<br />

her location. The FAA official counted just three jets “off in the distance” between 12:05 and<br />

12:55 p.m.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!