CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas
CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas
CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
In a region known for big blue skies 360 days of the year, most desert days once began with typically<br />
clear skies.<br />
But as USAF “Weather Force” tanker planes were photographed laying chemical tails in extensive grid<br />
patterns and characteristic satellite-marking X’s, Carnicom and other New Mexico skywatchers saw the<br />
planes creating artificial cirrus cloud layers that turned once clear skies into a milky haze.<br />
“One would have expected these days to be generally clear at that altitude,” Carnicom commented. “But<br />
that was not the case.”<br />
STEADHAM COMPARES CONTRAILS AND CHEMTRAILS<br />
More proof that chemtrails are not contrails came from a sky plume<br />
study conducted by Mark Steadham in the winter of 2000. As<br />
Steadham stated, “This report is the result of research into the<br />
science of contrail formation and an analysis by observation and<br />
measurement of contrail persistence. This research was inspired<br />
by the claims of an unnatural type of trail known as Chemtrails as<br />
an attempt to detect such trails.”<br />
Steadham simply matched his observations of heavy aircraft<br />
overflying Houston’s busy flight corridor to Flight Explorer. This<br />
subscription flight data service from the FAA identifies shows all<br />
aircraft flying on Instrument Flight Plans over the United States by<br />
type aircraft, location, altitude, heading and airspeed. Since military<br />
flights are omitted by Flight Explorer, Steadham confirmed the<br />
military aircraft he was seeing by their “unidentified” label.<br />
For four months, Steadham recorded meticulous data on flights over Houston, Texas. The warmest<br />
temperature at which a contrail was observed was -41°C. This agrees with the -40°C textbook threshold<br />
value for contrail formation.<br />
Among other data, Mark Steadham recorded the “persistence” of aircraft trails, measured in seconds.<br />
The results were remarkable. 96% of the contrails observed were in the 5-20 second range; 80%<br />
persisted for 30- seconds or less. One airliner contrail lasted for 25 minutes. Another persisted for five<br />
hours. They were exceptions.<br />
These examples tell Steadham’s chemtale:<br />
12/02/00<br />
11:00 am ~4-8 hrs. (military)<br />
11:45 am ~2 minutes (commercial)<br />
12:00 noon ~2 minutes 10 sec. (commercial)<br />
12/08/000<br />
8:50 pm 10 seconds (commercial)<br />
01:00 pm ~4-8 hrs. (military)<br />
01:00 pm 10 seconds (commercial)<br />
12/21/000<br />
8:50 am 20 seconds (commercial)<br />
09:00 am ~4-8 hrs. (military)<br />
09:20 am ~2 1/2 minutes (commercial)<br />
09:40 am ~4-8 hrs. (military)<br />
10:10 am 20 seconds (commercial)