CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas

Having served as commander of the 451st Information Operations Squadron at RAF Menwith Hill on
July 9, 2001, U.S. Air Force Master Intelligence Officer Lieutenant Colonel Michael Gibson continued to
dismiss chemtrails. Having served at this British node of the worldwide ECHELON spy network that
intercepts all phone, fax and email transmissions, Gibson must have been used to public complaints.
And having served as deputy chief of the Congressional Inquiry Division at air force headquarters in the
Pentagon, the lieutenant colonel was also well experienced in the damage control that obscuring public
enquiries.
But not everyone is impressed by the “contrails” explanation for lingering plumes laid down in grid
patterns by crisscrossing air force tankers in air too warm and dry to support condensation. As
chemtrails activist Diane Harvey wrote to Lt. Col. Gibson:
This responds to your “response” to Representative Mark Green concerning chemtrails. I have of
course removed your quotation marks from the word “chemtrails” and put them where they
belong: around the word “response”. Your ludicrous reply to sincere citizens’ demands for an
explanation is receiving precisely the quality and quantity of outrage it so richly deserves. There
are tens of thousands of us who have perforce been obliged to educate ourselves, in depth and
at tedious length, in regard to this relatively new phenomenon overhead. We’ve done our
homework, collected our research, and published our increasing encyclopedias of evidence. We
are not amused with your infantile “ice crystals” taradiddle.
My father, like you, was a colonel in the USAF. He was physically courageous, deeply honorable
and intellectually scrupulous. He never told lies, and neither do his children, who were patriotic
little career Air Force brats… The countless other perfectly sane citizens of this country who are
observing and reporting the factual proliferation of chemtrails are also not going to be content to
be spoken to in such a shamefully dismissive manner. We know precisely who is hoaxing who.
Remember the picture of the sprayer fitted to the KC-10 tanker? Here it is again, on the right. The
picture of a standard in-flight aircraft refueling nozzle is on the left.
If the U.S. Air Force wants to put a smoking gun to its head – this is it: