CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas

In the tradition of USA Today and similar chemtrail “coverage” by editors and producers more fond of
their corporate paychecks than journalistic ethics, Kostas immediately confused chemtrails with contrails
– before belaboring the seemingly obvious point that contrails are harmless to human health. At least
until the heat they trap and the sunlight they dim really kicks in.
Fallout from jet turbine exhaust is highly toxic. But this was not mentioned by “experts” happy to discuss
water vapor while taking potshots at all those contrary conspiratorialists.
“I have looked at those (chemtrail) websites a couple of times, and they’re right up there with the UFO
folks,” Paul Newman told Kostka. The physicist with the Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Branch
of NASA was careful not to mention the NASA-defined “UFOs” caught by its own space cameras –
which must make NASA “conspiratorialists” too!
The Durango drivel was prompted by a local talk on chemtrails:
Clifford Carnicom, a geophysicist and mathematician from Santa Fe, spoke at Storehouse
Baptist Church south of Durango on Saturday night. Carnicom told about 50 residents that he
believes a national or global organization is placing harmful particulates in jet emissions, which
he calls “aerosol trails.”
Carnicom presented videos and photographs he said showed suspicious aerosol trails that
stayed suspended in the sky longer than normal. However, Charles Knight, a senior scientist at
the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, said that under certain weather
conditions contrails could stay suspended in the sky for days.
Kostka failed to mention that in regards to the “certain weather conditions” necessary for contrail
formation, Carnicom had produced reams of official high-altitude temperature and humidity data over
Santa Fe showing conclusively that contrails could not have formed under the atmospheric conditions
existing at the times of heavy sky gridding.
Nor did the reporter refer to Steadham’s documented discrepancies between contrail and chemtrail
longevity over Houston.
Kostka also neglected to report the Espanola lab findings. Nor did the newspaper quote the senior Air
Traffic Controller manager who described on tape the climate modification missions flown by U.S. Air
Force tankers.
The Wright-Patterson scientists who described their work on chemtrails projects at Wright-Patterson to
Columbus Alive reporter Bob Fitrakis also went unmentioned in a story that carefully overlooked
irrefutable evidence of massive, ongoing chemtrail activity.
Instead, Kostka quoted FAA spokesman Allen Kenitzer mouthing the standard denials: “A couple of
years ago we were getting swamped with calls about this. All of these reports turned out to be nothing.”
Then why are they continuing?
“This is a very standard reply to receive, that everything’s normal,” long-time chemtrails researcher
Clifford Carnicom told Kostka. “It is not normal. Contrails are composed of water vapor. What I’m
speaking of is not emissions of water vapor. What I’m speaking of is the emissions of aerosol trails.”
I LEFT MY CHEMTRAILS IN SAN FRANCISCO
Even as Kostka was describing contrails, chemtrails were still regularly banding the sky above the
Golden Gate. “All this week grids and big blankets of perfectly straight and very wide lines have
appeared over San Francisco,” wrote a November 2002 correspondent: