CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas
CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas
CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
In the immortal and immoral words of one HAARP researcher to a reporter: “To see what will happen.”<br />
WEATHER VANDALS<br />
The first of three patents awarded to MIT physicist Bernard Eastlund describes his Method and<br />
Apparatus for Altering a Region of the Earth’s Atmosphere, Ionosphere and/or Magnetosphere as<br />
focusing on weather modification. Issued on August 11, 1987, commercial patent #4,686,605 claims that<br />
directed energy beams of more than one-billion watts can be used for “altering the upper atmosphere<br />
wind patterns using plumes of atmospheric particles as a lens or focusing device” to disturb weather<br />
thousands of miles away.<br />
Writing in Nexus magazine, Dr. Nick Begich and Jeanne Manning – authors of Angels Don’t Play This<br />
HAARP – note “leading-edge scientists are describing global weather as not only air pressure and<br />
thermal systems but also as an electrical system.” Scientists say “there is a super-powerful electrical<br />
connection between the ionosphere and the part of the atmosphere where our weather comes on-stage:<br />
the lower atmosphere.”<br />
Calling HAARP, “vandalism in the sky,” Begich and Manning report:<br />
Weather modification is possible by, for example, altering upper atmosphere wind patterns by<br />
constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric particles, which will act as a lens or focusing<br />
device. As far back as 1958, the chief White House adviser on weather modification, Captain<br />
Howard T. Orville, said the U.S. defense department was studying “ways to manipulate the<br />
charges of the Earth and sky and so affect the weather by using an electronic beam to ionize or<br />
de-ionize the atmosphere over a given area.<br />
Eastlund confirmed this, telling me, “I had looked at using this intense beam, which can be angled, to do<br />
some experiments in terms of guiding the jetstream, moving it from one spot to another.”<br />
Paul Schaefer has a degree is in electrical engineering and used to build nuclear weapons. Shaefer<br />
says, “The unnatural level of motion of highly energetic particles in the atmosphere and in radiation belts<br />
surrounding Earth is the villain in the weather disruptions.”<br />
Fire up giant transmitters like HAARP, and Shaefer’s computer models show how Earth discharges this<br />
sudden heat buildup, relieving stress and regaining balance through storms, earthquakes and volcanic<br />
eruptions. Commenting on HAARP-related experiments, Schaefer says, “One look at the weather<br />
should tell us that we are on the wrong path.”<br />
NEED TO KNOW<br />
Did you agree to this? Have you been officially notified of a February, 1990 Plans and Activities report<br />
RFP N00014-91-R-0001 jointly issued by the U.S. Air Force Geophysics Laboratory and the Office of<br />
Naval Research? Perhaps not. Its circulation was “restricted.”<br />
RFP N00014-91-R-0001 declares with emphasis, that HAARP will go “beyond basic research” to<br />
“controlling ionospheric processes” by “significantly altering” regions of the ionosphere at a range of<br />
1,200 miles or more.<br />
“What is clear,” this formerly classified study notes, “is that at one gigawatt and above effective radiated<br />
power...a variety of instability processes are triggered” in the ionosphere.