02.03.2013 Views

CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas

CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas

CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In the immortal and immoral words of one HAARP researcher to a reporter: “To see what will happen.”<br />

WEATHER VANDALS<br />

The first of three patents awarded to MIT physicist Bernard Eastlund describes his Method and<br />

Apparatus for Altering a Region of the Earth’s Atmosphere, Ionosphere and/or Magnetosphere as<br />

focusing on weather modification. Issued on August 11, 1987, commercial patent #4,686,605 claims that<br />

directed energy beams of more than one-billion watts can be used for “altering the upper atmosphere<br />

wind patterns using plumes of atmospheric particles as a lens or focusing device” to disturb weather<br />

thousands of miles away.<br />

Writing in Nexus magazine, Dr. Nick Begich and Jeanne Manning – authors of Angels Don’t Play This<br />

HAARP – note “leading-edge scientists are describing global weather as not only air pressure and<br />

thermal systems but also as an electrical system.” Scientists say “there is a super-powerful electrical<br />

connection between the ionosphere and the part of the atmosphere where our weather comes on-stage:<br />

the lower atmosphere.”<br />

Calling HAARP, “vandalism in the sky,” Begich and Manning report:<br />

Weather modification is possible by, for example, altering upper atmosphere wind patterns by<br />

constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric particles, which will act as a lens or focusing<br />

device. As far back as 1958, the chief White House adviser on weather modification, Captain<br />

Howard T. Orville, said the U.S. defense department was studying “ways to manipulate the<br />

charges of the Earth and sky and so affect the weather by using an electronic beam to ionize or<br />

de-ionize the atmosphere over a given area.<br />

Eastlund confirmed this, telling me, “I had looked at using this intense beam, which can be angled, to do<br />

some experiments in terms of guiding the jetstream, moving it from one spot to another.”<br />

Paul Schaefer has a degree is in electrical engineering and used to build nuclear weapons. Shaefer<br />

says, “The unnatural level of motion of highly energetic particles in the atmosphere and in radiation belts<br />

surrounding Earth is the villain in the weather disruptions.”<br />

Fire up giant transmitters like HAARP, and Shaefer’s computer models show how Earth discharges this<br />

sudden heat buildup, relieving stress and regaining balance through storms, earthquakes and volcanic<br />

eruptions. Commenting on HAARP-related experiments, Schaefer says, “One look at the weather<br />

should tell us that we are on the wrong path.”<br />

NEED TO KNOW<br />

Did you agree to this? Have you been officially notified of a February, 1990 Plans and Activities report<br />

RFP N00014-91-R-0001 jointly issued by the U.S. Air Force Geophysics Laboratory and the Office of<br />

Naval Research? Perhaps not. Its circulation was “restricted.”<br />

RFP N00014-91-R-0001 declares with emphasis, that HAARP will go “beyond basic research” to<br />

“controlling ionospheric processes” by “significantly altering” regions of the ionosphere at a range of<br />

1,200 miles or more.<br />

“What is clear,” this formerly classified study notes, “is that at one gigawatt and above effective radiated<br />

power...a variety of instability processes are triggered” in the ionosphere.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!