02.03.2013 Views

CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas

CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas

CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

We would be trying to destroy or at least grossly reduce the velocity in these individual energy<br />

sails by seeding the clouds with silver iodide in the top part of the cloud... and those tops would<br />

then have so many small droplets in them that the prevailing wind just blows them away and so<br />

an energy sail would be neutralized until it can regroup which may be several hours later.<br />

Livingston asserted that hurricane control was a national priority of the government in the 1960s and<br />

they had the ability to do it at that time – 40 years ago.<br />

Around 1954—after three major hurricanes slammed into 12 northeastern states—the U.S. Government<br />

allotted some $30 million to the U.S. Weather Bureau “for weather modification and weather control<br />

practices to the tune of about 30 million dollars,” Livingston stated.<br />

The resulting Project Storm Fury is well documented. As Jimmy Patterson reported for the Midland<br />

Reporter Telegram:<br />

“In the 1960s, a national priority of our government was hurricane control,” Livingston said.<br />

“Silver iodide is used as a nuclei that causes raindrops to form. The original hypothesis is that if<br />

you get enough rain or cool air into a hurricane you can diminish its velocity and strength. When I<br />

left the military in the 1960s, we had the ability to do that, and reduce wind velocity in hurricanes<br />

by 25% and damage caused by a hurricane by 63%.”<br />

As Livingston went on to explain, “Basically the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)<br />

was formed to take that responsibility…Their charge was to employ the most brilliant scientists around<br />

the world, and meteorologists and physicists, to work out a concept for reducing damages from<br />

hurricanes.”<br />

“Livingston revealed that on the 18th August 1969, five seedings at two-hour intervals on Hurricane<br />

Debbie, researchers deduced that the wind speed had decreased from 115mph to 80 mph. That is a<br />

30% reduction and a 45% reduction in damages,” the Watsons wrote. “On August 20th a second<br />

seeding decreased the wind speed again to just under 100 mph, a reduction of around 15%.”<br />

These initial successes were allegedly followed by the inadvertent redirection of a hurricane into<br />

Nicaragua.<br />

Project Storm Fury was supposedly shut down because the data obtained was not conclusive enough to<br />

prove that storm modification techniques were responsible for altering the tracks of giant circular storms<br />

that often change direction erratically, anyway. But many observers believe that the project – like so<br />

many others – went “black” at that time. And continues today.<br />

Because hurricanes are so dynamically unstable, this weather control expert maintained that just two<br />

seeding aircraft could change its path. “We’re carrying more cloud seeding material on one airplane now<br />

– over 800% more on each plane than we had during Project Storm Fury,” Livingston told Jones.<br />

Livingston has personally flown on 265 missions into the eyes of hurricanes and has gone on record as<br />

"most disgusted" with Hurricane Katrina, which he insists could have been minimized. With his hurricane<br />

control research confirmed by the Stanford Research Institute, Livingston currently works with scientists<br />

and pilots at Weather Modification Inc. in Fargo, North Dakota.<br />

SUE THEM ALL<br />

If weather modification is admitted, financial liability will be a big issue. According to the Stanford<br />

Research Institute, which joined Project Storm Fury in the late ‘Sixties, tinkering with hurricanes could<br />

result in major lawsuits if an accidentally strengthened or misdirected storm caused extensive damage<br />

and loss of life.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!