02.03.2013 Views

CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas

CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas

CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In late September 2002, Lou Aubuchont explained, “My<br />

scanner seems to be able to pick up the chatter when they<br />

are really close but not both ends of the transmissions. What<br />

I get is coming directly from the aircraft, I get nothing from a<br />

ground source/control.”<br />

He concluded, “They are using a computer controlled system<br />

that changes frequencies rapidly and my scanner only<br />

captures a frequency from the aircraft when they are very<br />

close, like right overhead.”<br />

One year after we first went to the self-censored corporate<br />

media with the Deep Sky interview tapes, the spraying had<br />

not let up over Maine. “We have been getting sprayed on average of three times per week and the<br />

spraying has been on a huge scale covering hundreds of thousands of square miles by the time the<br />

spraying stops,” Lou Aubuchont wrote on September 27, 2002.<br />

On October 9, he notified me of “Heavy spraying over Maine and New Hampshire”:<br />

At 10:00 am, I saw the first plumes being spread across the sky here in Parsonsfield, Maine and<br />

from that point on it was just tanker after tanker laying down a massive grid that extended well<br />

over into New Hampshire.<br />

They came from the northeast, northwest and east to west, it was quite a show and by 3:30PM<br />

the sky was a complete whiteout. We had some high thin cirrus clouds overhead when the<br />

spraying started here. The tankers were below the clouds and as the “Chemtrails “spread out it<br />

became hard to tell the cloud cover from the “Chemcloud”. But we ended up with a sick looking<br />

yellow-white overcast. You know, if it is just a hoax as the U.S.A.F. portrays it as being, it’s one<br />

hell of a hoax.<br />

UNMERRY CHRISTMAS FROM A SERGEANT-MAJOR<br />

The day after Christmas 2002, a retired Canadian Army sergeant major named Phil<br />

wrote from Teulon, a town approximately 30 minutes drive due north of Winnipeg:<br />

This summer on a couple of different occasions I observed these aircraft flying back and forth<br />

emitting these chemtrails for about an hour each time. On one of these occasions I watched with<br />

my neighbor who expressed extreme surprise and wonder at this activity.<br />

These aircraft emitted what I thought at first was their normal exhaust, after a few minutes it was<br />

obvious that the exhaust was not dissipating, but was just spreading, and forming into a light<br />

cloud which covered a great amount of area in the sky.<br />

Like the people in Espanola, we found that quite a few people suffered from the same illnesses,<br />

however my efforts in bringing attention to this activity was met with a bit of skepticism and just a<br />

cursory interest.<br />

A Lexus Nexis search made in 2002 showed 24 TV stations carrying nearly identical segments on<br />

chemtrails. From Baltimore to Florida to Houston, people being interviewed are watching chemtrails and<br />

getting sick. Invariably, the station runs an official denial or a joking rebuttal from their own meteorologist<br />

scientifically commenting on “conspiratorialists”. Almost all stations run compelling footage of bizarre<br />

aerial plume patterns, before dismissing the phenomenon.<br />

According to Bob Fitrakis, affiliate stations sometimes overlap while using local talent to report a local<br />

chemtrails angle. The result: key evidence and credible interviews replaced by ridicule.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!