CHEMTRAILS%20-%20CONFIRMED%20-%202010%20by%20William%20Thomas

Of the nine jets on his radarscope during that same time period on March 12, the official told
Brendt she should have been able to see only one from her location. Instead, she and
Aubuchont counted 30. The flights continued all day.
Such cloudy radar returns are consistent with clouds of talcum-fine aluminum particles released
by high-flying tankers in a process USAF Weather Force Specialists term, “aerial obscuration.”
The Air Traffic Control manager admitted that the chemicals sprayed by the tankers degraded
ATC radar returns. When asked if this posed a threat to flight safety, he replied, “not from my
perspective.” But the ATC manager added that similar military operations have been carried out
“on other dates” and “other regions” in the USA. When asked whether the air force jets crossed
into Canadian air space, he replied “yes.”
Corporate media ignored this taped evidence – just as its editors and producers continue to ignore
thousands of public reports and photographs, virtual miles of videotape (often their own footage
inadvertently catching chemtrailed skies), and certified sample analysis carried out by certified
laboratories.
In a third follow-up interview, Brendt and I decided to play a hunch. Referring to the mission objectives,
the ATC manager had actually said that weather modification “approximates” what he had been told. We
guessed that “climate modification” was more accurate.
When Brendt questioned Deep Sky again regarding the purpose of the spray planes, he agreed that
“climate” modification was the word used by higher authorities calling for airspace to be cleared for the
big military jets.
Fitrakis cited the example of the West-Quebec Post, which in May 2001 had spread chemtrails
photographs across its front page. Post publisher Fred Ryan reported that his readers had been
photographing and comparing the aerial activity for some time.” [Columbus Alive Mar 27/02]