- Page 1 and 2:
Rent arrears management practices i
- Page 3 and 4:
Contents Executive summary . . . .
- Page 5 and 6:
Executive summary Introduction This
- Page 7 and 8:
Key underlying factors were said to
- Page 9 and 10:
could, in part, reflect the growing
- Page 11 and 12:
overpayments and suspensions were p
- Page 13 and 14:
Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Backgrou
- Page 15 and 16:
arrears management and related aspe
- Page 17 and 18:
“… there may occasionally be ci
- Page 19 and 20:
under Article 8 of the Convention,
- Page 21 and 22:
y HAs . 37 The Circular informed as
- Page 23 and 24:
Pre-action protocol for possession
- Page 25 and 26:
The purpose of these interviews was
- Page 27 and 28:
Table 1.1 - Case Study HAs Organisa
- Page 29 and 30:
Chapter 2 Rent arrears management p
- Page 31 and 32:
Pawson et al’s study found that 9
- Page 33 and 34:
2.3 Rent arrears management practic
- Page 35 and 36:
this with any certainty . 69 Howeve
- Page 37 and 38:
authority can also lead to a lack o
- Page 39 and 40:
2.5 The use of Ground 8 Although th
- Page 41 and 42:
In the Hunter et al study, 97 which
- Page 43 and 44:
some comment on the effect of the P
- Page 45 and 46:
• Ground 8 provided certainty to
- Page 47 and 48:
There was a difference of opinion a
- Page 49 and 50:
3.3 The use of Ground 8 Whereas ans
- Page 51 and 52:
do so early enough, or at all . Cla
- Page 53 and 54:
Chapter 4 Rent collection and arrea
- Page 55 and 56:
4.3 Housing Benefit service perform
- Page 57 and 58:
Table 4.3 - Housing association evi
- Page 59 and 60:
As shown in Figure 4 .1, CORE data
- Page 61 and 62:
were collected for landlords with l
- Page 63 and 64:
Most associations report initiating
- Page 65 and 66:
5.2 Organisation of rent arrears ma
- Page 67 and 68:
Table 5.2 - Primary structure of ar
- Page 69 and 70:
Table 5.3 - Recent changes in organ
- Page 71 and 72:
Table 5.6 - Staff training provisio
- Page 73 and 74:
Within the transfer landlord cohort
- Page 75 and 76:
• Where arrears were accrued befo
- Page 77 and 78:
Table 5.9 - Estimated percentage of
- Page 79 and 80:
elatively high response rate achiev
- Page 81 and 82:
The survey sought to collect statis
- Page 83 and 84:
Ground 8 actions typically accounte
- Page 85 and 86:
How is the scale of Ground 8 use ch
- Page 87 and 88:
already routinely exercising the ac
- Page 89 and 90: Chapter 6 Case study evidence Chapt
- Page 91 and 92: Annex 2 outlines our method, includ
- Page 93 and 94: a couple of weeks to three months)
- Page 95 and 96: to officers and policies . Officers
- Page 97 and 98: RM put it, “caused uproar from te
- Page 99 and 100: preferred form of the organisation
- Page 101 and 102: tenant contacts are now recorded on
- Page 103 and 104: as a result, would make an order un
- Page 105 and 106: use - in these cases, it is viewed
- Page 107 and 108: g) The tenant perspective In each c
- Page 109 and 110: Ground 8 was generally to scrutinis
- Page 111 and 112: Ground 8 was said to be used as a
- Page 113 and 114: The key stakeholders regarded the P
- Page 115 and 116: ule it would not be used where HB w
- Page 117 and 118: Table A1.1 - Evicted households by
- Page 119 and 120: uncontactable as a result) . Where
- Page 121 and 122: Just under half of all cases in the
- Page 123 and 124: Annex 2 Case study HA selection Our
- Page 125 and 126: Annex 3 Profile of case study housi
- Page 127 and 128: However, after a review across its
- Page 129 and 130: as developing joint working with th
- Page 131 and 132: Annex 4 Case study topic guides HA
- Page 133 and 134: 19. What has been your recent exper
- Page 135 and 136: 12. How are your tenants helped wit
- Page 137 and 138: 9. If RSLs rely on Ground 8, what i
- Page 139: 4 Tenant employment circumstances (
- Page 143 and 144: Our offices Maple House 149 Tottenh