02.04.2013 Views

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - UNESCO World Heritage

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - UNESCO World Heritage

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - UNESCO World Heritage

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

104 NOMINATION DOSSIER "ANCIENT BEECH FORESTS OF GERMANY"<br />

Tab. 4.1: Duration of process<br />

protection in the nominated<br />

component parts<br />

The nominated property is<br />

predestined by its forest<br />

continuity to document<br />

the ongoing ecological<br />

processes of European<br />

beech forests since the last<br />

glacial period.<br />

Tab 4.2: States of naturalness<br />

of the five nominated component<br />

parts by comparison<br />

(SCHNEIDER 2008)<br />

Component<br />

part<br />

Processes under legal<br />

protection since<br />

Remarks<br />

Jasmund 1990 steep coast has never been exploited,<br />

256 ha since 1960<br />

Serrahn 1990 70 ha free of use since 1957<br />

Grumsin 1990<br />

Hainich 1997 subterritories free of use since 1965<br />

Kellerwald 1990, partly 1999 partly for decades, steep slopes have never<br />

been exploited<br />

results of the integrated enviromental monitoring<br />

and from a wealth of area-specifi c<br />

single measure ments.<br />

Old forest sites<br />

Th e fi ve component parts of the extension<br />

nomination are verifi ably old forest sites<br />

– with restrictions in the case of Serrahn<br />

(GLASER & HAUKE 2004). Old forest<br />

sites are characterised by an age-long continuous<br />

forest tradition. Th is forest continuity<br />

has guaranteed the characteristic<br />

edaphic diversity (ASSMANN 1994,<br />

WULF 1994) notwithstanding the periods<br />

of partly utilisation. Only the smallest<br />

of areas were temporarily inhabited during<br />

the last millennia, which is evidenced by<br />

objects found at settlement sites (shards and<br />

other objects) and historical documents (e.g.<br />

for Dachsberg in Grumsin, LUTHARDT<br />

et al. 2004). Due to the rather negligible<br />

historic impact, cultural history makes itself<br />

felt only at a local level, for example by evidence<br />

for soil cation depletion.<br />

Component<br />

part<br />

Number of<br />

surveys<br />

Average degree of<br />

naturalness [%]<br />

Naturalness of beech forests<br />

A fi rst comparative appraisal of the degree of<br />

naturalness of all nominated component parts<br />

applying a both ecological and monitoringcompatible<br />

methodology (BUCHEN-<br />

WALDINSTITUT in BUBLITZ 2005<br />

and SCHNEIDER 2008) is available<br />

to some extent. Degrees of naturalness were<br />

rated on a one-hectare sample area according<br />

to precisely defi ned features specifi c for<br />

natural and / or primeval beech forests,<br />

with the primary parameters being population<br />

structure, dynamics, and dead wood<br />

quantities (SCHNEIDER 2008). According<br />

to this, an assessed area can meet a<br />

maximum of 27 criteria for primeval forests.<br />

Th e natural beech forest on the island of<br />

Vilm (Rügen) can be used as a national<br />

“reference area” that meets 100% of the<br />

criteria, but is precluded from nomination<br />

due to its small area size and isolation.<br />

Th e highest degrees of naturalness determined<br />

(tab. 4.2) are evidence of the outstanding<br />

ecological value of the old beech<br />

forests within the German component parts.<br />

Degree of naturalness<br />

highest value [%]<br />

Jasmund 12 59.00 96.30<br />

Serrahn 3 72.80 74.10<br />

Grumsin 7 38.10 55.60 (60 – 70)<br />

Hainich 19 69.40 92.60<br />

Kellerwald 20 66.10 96.30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!