The Use of Iambic Pentameter in the

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Goldstein, E. B. (1999). Sensation and perception. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company. Gulick, W.L. & Stake, R.E. (1957). The effect of time on size-constancy. American Journal of Psychology, 70, 276-279. Hergenhahn, B. R., & Olson, Mathew H. (2001). An Introduction to Learning Theories 6 th edition. Upper Sadler River, New Jersey, Prentice Hall. Holden, K.L., Aldolf, J.A. & Woolford, B. (1997). Human Research Facility, Human- Computer Interface Design Guide. Lookheed-Martin Co. Houston, TX. Inhoff, A. W. & Tousman, S. (1990). Lexical integration across saccades in reading. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 52(4), 330-337. Intraub, H. & Richardson, M. (1989). Boundry extension: Fundamental aspect of pictorial representation of encoding artifact? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 1387-1397. Intraub, H., Bender, R. S. & Mangels, J.A. (1992). Looking at pictures but remember scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 180-191. Irwin, D. E, Carlson-Radvansky, L. A. & Andrews, R. V. (1995). Information processing during saccadic eye movements. Acta Psychologica, 90, 261-273. 116
Johnston, W.A., Schwarting, I.S. & Hawley, K.L. (1996). Novel pop-out, perceptual inhibition, and the stability-placticity dilemma. Converging Operations in the Study of Visual Selective Attention. 315-334.. Kramer, A., Coles, M. & Logan, G. (Eds.). American Psychology Association: Washington, DC. Jones, S. & Okey, M. (1997). The Windows Interface Guidelines for Software. Microsoft Press: Redmond, VA. Kimchi,, R. (1998) Uniform connectedness and grouping in the perceptual organization of hierarchical parts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1105-1118. Kimchi, R. & Hadad, H. (2002). Influence of past experience on perceptual grouping. Psychological Science,13, 41-47. Kimchi, R. (2000). The perceptual organization of visual objects: A microgenetic analysis. Vision Research, 40(10-12), 1333-1347. Köhler W. (1924). Die physischen Gestalten in Ruhe und im stationären Zustand: Eine naturphilosophische Untersuchung. Erlangen: Verlag der Philosophichen Akademie. Koffka, K.A. (1922). Perception: An introduction to the Gestalt-theorie. Psychological Bulletin, 19, 531-585. Koffka, K.A. (1935). Principles of Gestalt Psychology, Harcourt Brace, New York. Kurylo, D.D. (1997). Time course of perceptual grouping. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 142-147. 117
Page 1 and 2:
Time Course of Perceptual Grouping
Page 3 and 4:
Experiment 1 76 Method 76 Results a
Page 5 and 6:
List of Figures Figure 1. Illustrat
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
will look like and how it will comm
Page 13 and 14:
visibility of important interface e
Page 15 and 16:
displays are reported. Global and l
Page 17 and 18:
Electrical activity generated by th
Page 19 and 20:
would not be. It would be easier to
Page 21 and 22:
could be grouped by the principles
Page 23 and 24:
Figure 4. Gestalt principles of gro
Page 25 and 26:
One of the leaders in grouping and
Page 27 and 28:
defined by similar numbers. For exa
Page 29 and 30:
and Saasrinen (2000) observed that
Page 31 and 32:
proximity (Bailey, 1989; Bonney & W
Page 33 and 34:
find the target ‘Picture’ in th
Page 35 and 36:
Humans integrate many types of info
Page 37 and 38:
measures. As a result, the pilot wo
Page 39 and 40:
Figure 10. Pop-up advertisement wit
Page 41 and 42:
soldiers see in these speeded condi
Page 43 and 44:
2001), grouping by proximity and al
Page 45 and 46:
local letters, as illustrated by Fi
Page 47 and 48:
frequency channels at specific rang
Page 49 and 50:
Recent support for the Flexible Usa
Page 51 and 52:
occluded shape as being incomplete
Page 53 and 54:
search for the target in the experi
Page 55 and 56:
Gestalt principle of good continuat
Page 57 and 58:
columns of circles on the opposing
Page 59 and 60:
short stimulus durations can be use
Page 61 and 62:
Figure 15. Results for ambiguous pr
Page 63 and 64:
As shown in Figure 16B, for the lig
Page 65 and 66:
In review these findings, it become
Page 67 and 68:
in user interface display layouts.
Page 69 and 70:
were asked to make decisions about
Page 71 and 72:
columns of pushbuttons on either si
Page 73 and 74: principles that are depicted more g
Page 75 and 76: no longer perceived. These cases wi
Page 77 and 78: influence what ‘goes together’
Page 79 and 80: participants, randomly with replace
Page 81 and 82: Figure 23. Targets used in reported
Page 83 and 84: participants that were more than th
Page 85 and 86: that was presented in the pilot exp
Page 87 and 88: from three participants because one
Page 89 and 90: see, each of the four distributions
Page 91 and 92: The distribution of data from each
Page 93 and 94: Figure 28. Targets for Experiment 2
Page 95 and 96: Results and discussion Sixteen fema
Page 97 and 98: global grouping was significantly f
Page 99 and 100: Figure 32A depicts a box plot for g
Page 101 and 102: means, the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Te
Page 103 and 104: to group by the alternative scale.
Page 105 and 106: Table 4. Characteristics of RT dist
Page 107 and 108: General Discussion Research that ha
Page 109 and 110: Experiments 2A and 2B were designed
Page 111 and 112: the size scale within an existing i
Page 113 and 114: “Hotmail” has been reported to
Page 115 and 116: They are interesting within the con
Page 117 and 118: forms of similarity could also be t
Page 119 and 120: the context of vision science resea
Page 121 and 122: Bennett, K. B., Nagy, A. L., and Fl
Page 123: De Valois, R. L. & De Valois, K. K.
Page 127 and 128: Nass, C., Isbister, K., & Lee, E.J.
Page 129 and 130: Palmer, S. E. & Rock, I. (1994). Re
Page 131 and 132: Sanocki, T.(2001). Interaction of s
Page 133 and 134: Tullis, T. S. (1981). An evaluation
Page 135: About the Author Melissa F. Schulz
show all

The Use of Iambic Pentameter in the

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?