03.04.2013 Views

The Use of Iambic Pentameter in the

The Use of Iambic Pentameter in the

The Use of Iambic Pentameter in the

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

local letters, as illustrated by Figure 12. In each stimulus, a cluster <strong>of</strong> small letters (local<br />

letters) was configured to form <strong>the</strong> shape <strong>of</strong> a much larger alternative letter (global letter).<br />

Participants were asked to identify global letters <strong>in</strong> some trials and local letters <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

trials. To study how global and local letters were <strong>in</strong>itially processed, Navon limited <strong>the</strong><br />

stimulus duration to 150ms. Participant responses and reaction times were recorded.<br />

Figure 12. Experimental stimuli with global and local letters<br />

Note. Presented by Navon, 1981. Each stimulus conta<strong>in</strong>s both a global letter and local letters. On <strong>the</strong> left, a global letter<br />

‘E’ is constructed <strong>of</strong> local ‘A’s. On <strong>the</strong> right, a global letter ‘A’ is constructed <strong>of</strong> local ‘E’s.<br />

Navon (1981) predicted that at stimulus durations as short as 150ms, it would be<br />

easier for participants to identify <strong>the</strong> global letter, as opposed to local letters. Navon<br />

found that for correct responses, participant reaction times for nam<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> global letters <strong>in</strong><br />

each stimulus was significantly faster than that for <strong>the</strong> local letters. This suggests an<br />

advantage for <strong>the</strong> process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> global <strong>in</strong>formation for object identification early <strong>in</strong> visual<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r researchers extended Navon’s (1981) research to exam<strong>in</strong>e global and local<br />

group<strong>in</strong>g across time. Sanocki (1993) hypo<strong>the</strong>sized that <strong>the</strong> relative contribution <strong>of</strong> global<br />

and local <strong>in</strong>formation to <strong>the</strong> eventual <strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>of</strong> an object could change across time.<br />

Specifically, Sanocki predicted that global <strong>in</strong>formation would have a greater <strong>in</strong>fluence on<br />

object identification early <strong>in</strong> vision and that local <strong>in</strong>formation would have a greater<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!