03.04.2013 Views

The Use of Iambic Pentameter in the

The Use of Iambic Pentameter in the

The Use of Iambic Pentameter in the

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

As shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 16B, for <strong>the</strong> lightness similarity experiment, group<strong>in</strong>g was<br />

based primarily on pre-constancy lightness at <strong>the</strong> shorter exposure time (80.5% pre-<br />

constancy, 19.5 post-constancy at 200ms). At <strong>the</strong> longest exposure time, however, pre-<br />

constancy group<strong>in</strong>g decreased and <strong>the</strong>re was an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> post-constancy group<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(38% pre-constancy, 62% post-constancy at 2000ms). <strong>The</strong>se results show that group<strong>in</strong>g<br />

can beg<strong>in</strong> by pre-constancy lightness and <strong>the</strong>n switch to occur by post-constancy<br />

lightness when exposure time is <strong>in</strong>creased.<br />

Group<strong>in</strong>g by shape similarity. In a second experiment by Schulz and Sanocki<br />

(2001), ambiguous shape stimuli were presented for 200 or 2000ms. Experimental<br />

stimuli (Figure 17A) followed shape completion stimuli used <strong>in</strong> prior research (Palmer,<br />

Neff & Beck, 1996). Stimuli conta<strong>in</strong>ed 5 columns <strong>of</strong> shapes. Participants were asked to<br />

group <strong>the</strong> central column <strong>of</strong> shapes with <strong>the</strong> columns on <strong>the</strong> right or left hand side by<br />

similarity and responses were recorded. Two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> outer columns on each experimental<br />

stimulus were composed <strong>of</strong> half circles. <strong>The</strong> oppos<strong>in</strong>g two outer columns were composed<br />

<strong>of</strong> full circles. <strong>The</strong> critical central column was composed <strong>of</strong> circles. However, <strong>the</strong> central<br />

column was manipulated by an opaque strip that was depicted to be <strong>in</strong> front <strong>of</strong> it. As a<br />

result, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>complete shape <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> central circles appeared to match <strong>the</strong> shape <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two<br />

columns <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>complete circles on one side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stimulus. If participants grouped <strong>the</strong><br />

central circles by similarity <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>complete shape, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>y would group <strong>the</strong> central<br />

circles with this side <strong>of</strong> columns. In Figure 17A, for example, <strong>the</strong> central circles match<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>complete shape <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> circles on <strong>the</strong> left. However, after <strong>the</strong> opaque strip is<br />

accounted for, <strong>the</strong> complete shape <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> central circles should be perceived. This<br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!