The Use of Iambic Pentameter in the
The Use of Iambic Pentameter in the
The Use of Iambic Pentameter in the
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
As shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 16B, for <strong>the</strong> lightness similarity experiment, group<strong>in</strong>g was<br />
based primarily on pre-constancy lightness at <strong>the</strong> shorter exposure time (80.5% pre-<br />
constancy, 19.5 post-constancy at 200ms). At <strong>the</strong> longest exposure time, however, pre-<br />
constancy group<strong>in</strong>g decreased and <strong>the</strong>re was an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> post-constancy group<strong>in</strong>g<br />
(38% pre-constancy, 62% post-constancy at 2000ms). <strong>The</strong>se results show that group<strong>in</strong>g<br />
can beg<strong>in</strong> by pre-constancy lightness and <strong>the</strong>n switch to occur by post-constancy<br />
lightness when exposure time is <strong>in</strong>creased.<br />
Group<strong>in</strong>g by shape similarity. In a second experiment by Schulz and Sanocki<br />
(2001), ambiguous shape stimuli were presented for 200 or 2000ms. Experimental<br />
stimuli (Figure 17A) followed shape completion stimuli used <strong>in</strong> prior research (Palmer,<br />
Neff & Beck, 1996). Stimuli conta<strong>in</strong>ed 5 columns <strong>of</strong> shapes. Participants were asked to<br />
group <strong>the</strong> central column <strong>of</strong> shapes with <strong>the</strong> columns on <strong>the</strong> right or left hand side by<br />
similarity and responses were recorded. Two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> outer columns on each experimental<br />
stimulus were composed <strong>of</strong> half circles. <strong>The</strong> oppos<strong>in</strong>g two outer columns were composed<br />
<strong>of</strong> full circles. <strong>The</strong> critical central column was composed <strong>of</strong> circles. However, <strong>the</strong> central<br />
column was manipulated by an opaque strip that was depicted to be <strong>in</strong> front <strong>of</strong> it. As a<br />
result, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>complete shape <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> central circles appeared to match <strong>the</strong> shape <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two<br />
columns <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>complete circles on one side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stimulus. If participants grouped <strong>the</strong><br />
central circles by similarity <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>complete shape, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>y would group <strong>the</strong> central<br />
circles with this side <strong>of</strong> columns. In Figure 17A, for example, <strong>the</strong> central circles match<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>complete shape <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> circles on <strong>the</strong> left. However, after <strong>the</strong> opaque strip is<br />
accounted for, <strong>the</strong> complete shape <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> central circles should be perceived. This<br />
55