06.04.2013 Views

Osprey - General Military - Knight - The Warrior and ... - Brego-weard

Osprey - General Military - Knight - The Warrior and ... - Brego-weard

Osprey - General Military - Knight - The Warrior and ... - Brego-weard

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

separate organizations drawn from shire levies or town militia. <strong>The</strong>y formed<br />

contingents with their own internal comm<strong>and</strong> structures (of 'twenties' <strong>and</strong> 'hundreds'<br />

in Engl<strong>and</strong>, led by vintenard <strong>and</strong> centenard, men who drew a higher rate of pay <strong>and</strong><br />

were probably leaders within the communities from which the troops came). <strong>The</strong><br />

mixed retinue, in contrast, saw the indentured lord recruiting both men-at-arms<br />

<strong>and</strong> archers within the same organization. How these mixed retinues took the field<br />

continues to be a matter of debate. None of our sources are clear enough to tell us<br />

whether the archers were separated out <strong>and</strong> combined into units in their own right or<br />

whether they formed along with the lord <strong>and</strong> his men-at-arms. <strong>The</strong> events of the Wars<br />

of the Roses would suggest that the latter was the case. How else would lords <strong>and</strong><br />

their retinues switch sides during battle, as Lord Grey of Ruthin did at the battle of<br />

Northampton in 1460, his whole force laying down their arms allowing the Yorkists<br />

to march past? Separating out the archers would also require an extra layer of<br />

comm<strong>and</strong> to be created, with a lord being designated as comm<strong>and</strong>er of the archers,<br />

or of a part of them. It would make more sense to retain the archers under the<br />

leadership of the lord <strong>and</strong> men-at-arms with whom they were indented rather than<br />

have to create a whole new comm<strong>and</strong> structure.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Ordonannce armies of 15th-century France <strong>and</strong> Burgundy were slightly<br />

different, but their consistent organization <strong>and</strong> permanence did not ultimately change<br />

the way in which the armies were formed on the field. <strong>The</strong> lanced fournied were<br />

effectively the equivalent of conroid <strong>and</strong> these were combined into companies under<br />

noble captains in the same way that the conroid were combined<br />

within aristocratic retinues; these comp£<br />

formed up into battles <strong>and</strong> divisions in<br />

a way almost indistinguishable from<br />

what are often considered less 'modern'<br />

armies. Charles the Bold, Duke of<br />

Burgundy, may have conceived of an<br />

ideal battle plan for his engagement<br />

against the Swiss at Lausanne in 1476,<br />

consisting of eight battles in distinct<br />

lines, interspersing archers, foot troops<br />

<strong>and</strong> cavalry across the line <strong>and</strong> within,<br />

but the overall structure was still a<br />

symmetrical formation consisting of<br />

a vanguard, main battle <strong>and</strong> rearguard,<br />

<strong>and</strong> almost certainly at the point of<br />

battle the overly complex structure<br />

CAMPAIGN AND BATTLE •*}*•<br />

Two armies lined up<br />

for battle. Although these<br />

supposedly represent the<br />

battle of Agincourt, the<br />

illustrator has in fact<br />

drawn a fairly generic<br />

image of a 15th-century<br />

battle. (<strong>The</strong> Art Archive)<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!