06.04.2013 Views

Osprey - General Military - Knight - The Warrior and ... - Brego-weard

Osprey - General Military - Knight - The Warrior and ... - Brego-weard

Osprey - General Military - Knight - The Warrior and ... - Brego-weard

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

open ground, but would lead them on long chases across rough country, just the sort<br />

of thing that a hunting horse excelled at. Alternatively, Ayton suggests, the English<br />

knights might have felt the need to push the boat out in terms of status <strong>and</strong> display<br />

against a foe considered the pinnacle of European chivalry by bringing their finest<br />

<strong>and</strong> most expensive mounts.<br />

HORSE ARMOUR<br />

Such investments needed to be protected, <strong>and</strong> it is unsurprising that there should be<br />

a development in horse armour that parallels that of armour for the knight. It was<br />

by no means a total innovation; the late Roman army had used horses wholly covered<br />

in mail or lamellar armour for the cataphracti (literally 'completely enclosed ) or<br />

kLibanophoroi (meaning camp oven'; a humorous reference to how quickly these fully<br />

armoured men <strong>and</strong> horses would heat up!), both of which were adopted from their<br />

Sassanid Persian neighbours who spanned the Middle East between the second <strong>and</strong><br />

seventh centuries. Whilst such armour continued to be used in small numbers in the<br />

Byzantine East, this practice had died out in Western Europe long before.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Rule of the Templars makes no reference to either bards or horse armour<br />

(although it does specify that no brother should have an ornate <strong>and</strong> decorated bridle),<br />

which might suggest that at the time of its writing (between 1135 <strong>and</strong> 1187) horse<br />

armour was not used. When interpreting the visual sources, the same problem exists<br />

for identifying horse armour as it does for spotting early 13th-century plate armour.<br />

Just as a pair of plates might be hidden beneath a flowing surcoat, so horse armour<br />

might lie beneath an emblazoned bard', 'caparison' or 'hoarding' — cloth covers that<br />

need not be armour themselves. Such bardings appear in illustrations from around the<br />

first decade of the 13th century, but this need not mean that the horse was armoured<br />

at this point. By the end of the 13th century the term miLited cum equud coopertiu,<br />

'warriors with covered horses', was betng used to differentiate between the knight <strong>and</strong><br />

man-at-arms <strong>and</strong> the less well equipped <strong>and</strong> socially inferior sergeants, squires,<br />

hobelars <strong>and</strong> the like, who were referred to as milited cum equM du)coopertud.<br />

A clear indication of armour is to be found in a manuscript of Thomas of Kent's<br />

Roman

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!