Osprey - General Military - Knight - The Warrior and ... - Brego-weard
Osprey - General Military - Knight - The Warrior and ... - Brego-weard
Osprey - General Military - Knight - The Warrior and ... - Brego-weard
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
134<br />
KNIGHT<br />
CAPTURE, WOUNDS AND THE RISK<br />
OF DEATH<br />
It is often said that the majority of casualties in battle were inflicted during the rout.<br />
A fleeing man turning his back on his loe <strong>and</strong> making no attempt to defend himself was<br />
much easier to kill, especially if he had thrown oft his heavy armour to speed his<br />
escape. Just as often, however, it was mischance rather than enemy action that killed<br />
men as they ran. Large numbers might be drowned as they sought to escape across<br />
rivers. Many of the Londoners fleeing Edward's knights at Lewes drowned in the<br />
Ouse; a large number of English were killed at the Bannock burn, slowed up as they<br />
tried to cross it; <strong>and</strong> against the Scots at Myton on 1319 more were killed fleeing across<br />
the river Swale than were killed on the battlefield.<br />
<strong>The</strong> battles themselves were far from bloodless but, as with determining the<br />
number of combatants, the exact number of casualties is difficult to ascertain from<br />
the source material. Quite often the chroniclers will only put it in terms of mass,<br />
writing that 'many were killed' or hundreds' or thous<strong>and</strong>s', aiming to give an<br />
impression of scale rather than an accurate account of losses. After all, they were<br />
unlikely to be privy to such information. Just as with the number of combatants, the<br />
numbers of dead are often inflated, particularly if the chronicler is partial. Nor will we<br />
always get complete figures. Orderic Vitalis tells us that at the battle of Bremule only<br />
three were killed, but these are the knights; he says nothing of the footsoldiers who<br />
fought. Emphasis was inevitably placed on naming the nobles who fell, the men ol<br />
note <strong>and</strong> those from the local area whose families patronized the chroniclers' work<br />
or abbey.<br />
<strong>The</strong> knightly combatant was, perhaps, the man who risked the least on the field.<br />
As has been noted his armour offered him substantial protection from weapons, whilst<br />
the chivalric ethos that he shared with many of his opponents might also serve him<br />
well. It would be wrong, however, to assume from this that battle offered no risks for<br />
the knight. <strong>The</strong> historical narratives do give details of wounds suffered by individuals.<br />
Joinville records how during the battle of Mansourah Erard de Siverey, one of his<br />
household, received a blow that cut through his nose so that it was left dangling<br />
over his lips. Although he survived for most of the battle, indeed riding off to get<br />
reinforcements for Joinville's beleaguered household, he died at its end. <strong>The</strong> future<br />
Henry V was hit in the face by an arrow at the battle of Shrewsbury in 1403. But such<br />
wounds need not be fatal. Surgical techniques were not as basic as one might think <strong>and</strong><br />
it was possible for men to survive quite terrible wounds. <strong>The</strong> skull of body number 16<br />
from the excavation of the mass grave at the Wars of the Roses battlefield of Towton,