06.04.2013 Views

Osprey - General Military - Knight - The Warrior and ... - Brego-weard

Osprey - General Military - Knight - The Warrior and ... - Brego-weard

Osprey - General Military - Knight - The Warrior and ... - Brego-weard

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

134<br />

KNIGHT<br />

CAPTURE, WOUNDS AND THE RISK<br />

OF DEATH<br />

It is often said that the majority of casualties in battle were inflicted during the rout.<br />

A fleeing man turning his back on his loe <strong>and</strong> making no attempt to defend himself was<br />

much easier to kill, especially if he had thrown oft his heavy armour to speed his<br />

escape. Just as often, however, it was mischance rather than enemy action that killed<br />

men as they ran. Large numbers might be drowned as they sought to escape across<br />

rivers. Many of the Londoners fleeing Edward's knights at Lewes drowned in the<br />

Ouse; a large number of English were killed at the Bannock burn, slowed up as they<br />

tried to cross it; <strong>and</strong> against the Scots at Myton on 1319 more were killed fleeing across<br />

the river Swale than were killed on the battlefield.<br />

<strong>The</strong> battles themselves were far from bloodless but, as with determining the<br />

number of combatants, the exact number of casualties is difficult to ascertain from<br />

the source material. Quite often the chroniclers will only put it in terms of mass,<br />

writing that 'many were killed' or hundreds' or thous<strong>and</strong>s', aiming to give an<br />

impression of scale rather than an accurate account of losses. After all, they were<br />

unlikely to be privy to such information. Just as with the number of combatants, the<br />

numbers of dead are often inflated, particularly if the chronicler is partial. Nor will we<br />

always get complete figures. Orderic Vitalis tells us that at the battle of Bremule only<br />

three were killed, but these are the knights; he says nothing of the footsoldiers who<br />

fought. Emphasis was inevitably placed on naming the nobles who fell, the men ol<br />

note <strong>and</strong> those from the local area whose families patronized the chroniclers' work<br />

or abbey.<br />

<strong>The</strong> knightly combatant was, perhaps, the man who risked the least on the field.<br />

As has been noted his armour offered him substantial protection from weapons, whilst<br />

the chivalric ethos that he shared with many of his opponents might also serve him<br />

well. It would be wrong, however, to assume from this that battle offered no risks for<br />

the knight. <strong>The</strong> historical narratives do give details of wounds suffered by individuals.<br />

Joinville records how during the battle of Mansourah Erard de Siverey, one of his<br />

household, received a blow that cut through his nose so that it was left dangling<br />

over his lips. Although he survived for most of the battle, indeed riding off to get<br />

reinforcements for Joinville's beleaguered household, he died at its end. <strong>The</strong> future<br />

Henry V was hit in the face by an arrow at the battle of Shrewsbury in 1403. But such<br />

wounds need not be fatal. Surgical techniques were not as basic as one might think <strong>and</strong><br />

it was possible for men to survive quite terrible wounds. <strong>The</strong> skull of body number 16<br />

from the excavation of the mass grave at the Wars of the Roses battlefield of Towton,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!