06.04.2013 Views

Osprey - General Military - Knight - The Warrior and ... - Brego-weard

Osprey - General Military - Knight - The Warrior and ... - Brego-weard

Osprey - General Military - Knight - The Warrior and ... - Brego-weard

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

182<br />

KNIGHT<br />

<strong>The</strong> seal of Henry II of<br />

Engl<strong>and</strong>. <strong>The</strong> seal served<br />

as a guarantee of the<br />

authenticity of a<br />

document, but it also<br />

served as a vehicle for the<br />

promotion of the owner's<br />

self-image. (<strong>The</strong> Art<br />

Archive)<br />

banners, knights had pennons'. According to Froissart, Sir<br />

Thomas Trivet, whilst on campaign with the Duke of<br />

Buckingham in 1380, asked the duke, 'My lord if you<br />

please I will this day display my banner; for, thanks<br />

to God, I have a sufficient revenue to support the<br />

state which a banner requires' <strong>and</strong>, as we saw<br />

above (see p. 121), Sir John Ch<strong>and</strong>os was able to<br />

lead men beneath a knight's pennant before<br />

choosing the auspicious occasion of the battle of<br />

Najera to unfurl his banner <strong>and</strong> formally adopt<br />

the dignity of banneret. In the fiscal terms of the<br />

exchequer <strong>and</strong> royal clerks to be a banneret was to<br />

be a superior sort of a knight, receiving a higher<br />

rate of pay for one's martial service. By 1300 it is<br />

clear that bannerets straddled the divide between the<br />

magnates <strong>and</strong> the knights. Very few of them were<br />

considered worthy ot their own individual summons to<br />

Parliament, which was a honour reserved for the magnates, but<br />

almost all were considered ineligible tor election to Parliament, which set<br />

them above the knight of the shire. This position was to be relatively short lived. By the<br />

15th century the term had disappeared; the upper echelons of the banneret group had<br />

become barons whilst the lower sank back into the ranks of the ordinary knight.<br />

<strong>The</strong> nobility were suspicious <strong>and</strong> resentful of the knights' taking on the trappings<br />

<strong>and</strong> behaviours of their betters, <strong>and</strong> it may have been this that led to the increasingly<br />

elitist nature ot chivalry, in particular the greater ceremony attached to the making ot<br />

a knight <strong>and</strong> emphasis on manners <strong>and</strong> courtesy. <strong>The</strong> elaboration of knightly culture,<br />

<strong>and</strong> an attendant rise in the cost of maintaining the social trappings of the rank, served<br />

to re-draw the dividing line between those who were to be considered knightly by<br />

dint of their wealth <strong>and</strong> social status <strong>and</strong> those who could fight in full armour <strong>and</strong><br />

with horse.<br />

Again, the extent to <strong>and</strong> way in which such changes expressed themselves varied<br />

from region to region. <strong>The</strong> unfree minuterialej, for example, remained a part of<br />

German elite society well into the 13th century. In southern France the knight<br />

remained a military retainer ot relatively low status, a professional soldier distinct from<br />

the aristocracy. In urban Italy the noble knightly families were often indistinguishable<br />

from the non-noble mercantile families whose wealth gave them a status equal to their<br />

noble neighbours, in a manner similar to the top levels of the merchant classes in other<br />

major cities of Europe.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!