Osprey - General Military - Knight - The Warrior and ... - Brego-weard
Osprey - General Military - Knight - The Warrior and ... - Brego-weard
Osprey - General Military - Knight - The Warrior and ... - Brego-weard
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
182<br />
KNIGHT<br />
<strong>The</strong> seal of Henry II of<br />
Engl<strong>and</strong>. <strong>The</strong> seal served<br />
as a guarantee of the<br />
authenticity of a<br />
document, but it also<br />
served as a vehicle for the<br />
promotion of the owner's<br />
self-image. (<strong>The</strong> Art<br />
Archive)<br />
banners, knights had pennons'. According to Froissart, Sir<br />
Thomas Trivet, whilst on campaign with the Duke of<br />
Buckingham in 1380, asked the duke, 'My lord if you<br />
please I will this day display my banner; for, thanks<br />
to God, I have a sufficient revenue to support the<br />
state which a banner requires' <strong>and</strong>, as we saw<br />
above (see p. 121), Sir John Ch<strong>and</strong>os was able to<br />
lead men beneath a knight's pennant before<br />
choosing the auspicious occasion of the battle of<br />
Najera to unfurl his banner <strong>and</strong> formally adopt<br />
the dignity of banneret. In the fiscal terms of the<br />
exchequer <strong>and</strong> royal clerks to be a banneret was to<br />
be a superior sort of a knight, receiving a higher<br />
rate of pay for one's martial service. By 1300 it is<br />
clear that bannerets straddled the divide between the<br />
magnates <strong>and</strong> the knights. Very few of them were<br />
considered worthy ot their own individual summons to<br />
Parliament, which was a honour reserved for the magnates, but<br />
almost all were considered ineligible tor election to Parliament, which set<br />
them above the knight of the shire. This position was to be relatively short lived. By the<br />
15th century the term had disappeared; the upper echelons of the banneret group had<br />
become barons whilst the lower sank back into the ranks of the ordinary knight.<br />
<strong>The</strong> nobility were suspicious <strong>and</strong> resentful of the knights' taking on the trappings<br />
<strong>and</strong> behaviours of their betters, <strong>and</strong> it may have been this that led to the increasingly<br />
elitist nature ot chivalry, in particular the greater ceremony attached to the making ot<br />
a knight <strong>and</strong> emphasis on manners <strong>and</strong> courtesy. <strong>The</strong> elaboration of knightly culture,<br />
<strong>and</strong> an attendant rise in the cost of maintaining the social trappings of the rank, served<br />
to re-draw the dividing line between those who were to be considered knightly by<br />
dint of their wealth <strong>and</strong> social status <strong>and</strong> those who could fight in full armour <strong>and</strong><br />
with horse.<br />
Again, the extent to <strong>and</strong> way in which such changes expressed themselves varied<br />
from region to region. <strong>The</strong> unfree minuterialej, for example, remained a part of<br />
German elite society well into the 13th century. In southern France the knight<br />
remained a military retainer ot relatively low status, a professional soldier distinct from<br />
the aristocracy. In urban Italy the noble knightly families were often indistinguishable<br />
from the non-noble mercantile families whose wealth gave them a status equal to their<br />
noble neighbours, in a manner similar to the top levels of the merchant classes in other<br />
major cities of Europe.