Osprey - General Military - Knight - The Warrior and ... - Brego-weard
Osprey - General Military - Knight - The Warrior and ... - Brego-weard
Osprey - General Military - Knight - The Warrior and ... - Brego-weard
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
KNIGHT<br />
Evesham saw the end of<br />
the baronial revolt against<br />
Henry III. By the end of the<br />
battle Simon de Montfort<br />
was killed <strong>and</strong> his body<br />
hacked to pieces, the head<br />
sent by Roger Mortimer to<br />
his wife Maud at Wigmore<br />
Castle as a trophy.<br />
(Bridgeman Art Library)<br />
136<br />
was so wise <strong>and</strong> full of devices, he would have found some means of establishing a<br />
peace between France <strong>and</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong>; <strong>and</strong> was so much beloved by the king of Engl<strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> his court, that they would have believed what he should have said in preference<br />
to all others.<br />
As Orderic says of the knights at Bremule, they sought to capture their enemies not<br />
to kill them.<br />
Whilst this was for the most part true, there were occasions when the surrender of<br />
a knight was neither practical nor desired. One account of the battle of Evesham in<br />
1265 suggests that Edward <strong>and</strong> the Earl of Gloucester assigned 12 knights, including<br />
the third of the royalist comm<strong>and</strong>ers Roger Mortimer, to pick out Simon de Montfort,<br />
leader of the rebels, <strong>and</strong> ensure his death on the field. Edward was seeking to end the<br />
protracted conflict between the king <strong>and</strong> the baronial party <strong>and</strong> the clearest way to do<br />
this was to kill the figurehead of that movement, Montfort himself. Similarly politically<br />
motivated killings took place during the Wars of the Roses, renowned for the slaughter<br />
of the nobilily they witnessed.<br />
When knights faced non-knightly combatants the rules of chivalry no longer<br />
applied <strong>and</strong> the capture of knights for ransom was not a concern. At Courtrai the<br />
Flemish refused to take prisoners, their leader Guy de Namur supposedly giving<br />
the comm<strong>and</strong> to 'kill all ... that has spurs on'. Being formed almost entirely of the<br />
low-born <strong>and</strong> merchant community, the Flemings could expect no mercy from the<br />
French aristocracy <strong>and</strong> so would offer none. <strong>The</strong> same was true of the Swiss in their<br />
wars against the French <strong>and</strong> Burgundians during the 14th <strong>and</strong> 15th centuries.<br />
One of the key battlegrounds for the debate about the limits <strong>and</strong> reality of chivalry<br />
has been Henry V's order to execute French prisoners in the closing stages of the<br />
battle of Agincourt. Despite the seeming incongruity of the action, it is clear that<br />
contemporaries, both French <strong>and</strong> English, did not consider it to be an act requiring<br />
censure. <strong>The</strong>re were practical reasons for the action. <strong>The</strong> English were outnumbered,