06.04.2013 Views

Osprey - General Military - Knight - The Warrior and ... - Brego-weard

Osprey - General Military - Knight - The Warrior and ... - Brego-weard

Osprey - General Military - Knight - The Warrior and ... - Brego-weard

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

KNIGHT<br />

Evesham saw the end of<br />

the baronial revolt against<br />

Henry III. By the end of the<br />

battle Simon de Montfort<br />

was killed <strong>and</strong> his body<br />

hacked to pieces, the head<br />

sent by Roger Mortimer to<br />

his wife Maud at Wigmore<br />

Castle as a trophy.<br />

(Bridgeman Art Library)<br />

136<br />

was so wise <strong>and</strong> full of devices, he would have found some means of establishing a<br />

peace between France <strong>and</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong>; <strong>and</strong> was so much beloved by the king of Engl<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> his court, that they would have believed what he should have said in preference<br />

to all others.<br />

As Orderic says of the knights at Bremule, they sought to capture their enemies not<br />

to kill them.<br />

Whilst this was for the most part true, there were occasions when the surrender of<br />

a knight was neither practical nor desired. One account of the battle of Evesham in<br />

1265 suggests that Edward <strong>and</strong> the Earl of Gloucester assigned 12 knights, including<br />

the third of the royalist comm<strong>and</strong>ers Roger Mortimer, to pick out Simon de Montfort,<br />

leader of the rebels, <strong>and</strong> ensure his death on the field. Edward was seeking to end the<br />

protracted conflict between the king <strong>and</strong> the baronial party <strong>and</strong> the clearest way to do<br />

this was to kill the figurehead of that movement, Montfort himself. Similarly politically<br />

motivated killings took place during the Wars of the Roses, renowned for the slaughter<br />

of the nobilily they witnessed.<br />

When knights faced non-knightly combatants the rules of chivalry no longer<br />

applied <strong>and</strong> the capture of knights for ransom was not a concern. At Courtrai the<br />

Flemish refused to take prisoners, their leader Guy de Namur supposedly giving<br />

the comm<strong>and</strong> to 'kill all ... that has spurs on'. Being formed almost entirely of the<br />

low-born <strong>and</strong> merchant community, the Flemings could expect no mercy from the<br />

French aristocracy <strong>and</strong> so would offer none. <strong>The</strong> same was true of the Swiss in their<br />

wars against the French <strong>and</strong> Burgundians during the 14th <strong>and</strong> 15th centuries.<br />

One of the key battlegrounds for the debate about the limits <strong>and</strong> reality of chivalry<br />

has been Henry V's order to execute French prisoners in the closing stages of the<br />

battle of Agincourt. Despite the seeming incongruity of the action, it is clear that<br />

contemporaries, both French <strong>and</strong> English, did not consider it to be an act requiring<br />

censure. <strong>The</strong>re were practical reasons for the action. <strong>The</strong> English were outnumbered,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!