Open and Distance Learning for Sustainable Development

190
In 2001, National Open University of Nigeria was re-established, proving that open and
distance learning is not only cost- effective, it is also a most appropriate avenue for widening
access to education, which has helped to produce a better skilled workforce, which in turn has
led to the growth and development of both local and national economies. Typically, graduates
of distance education programmes find it easier to participate in the economic mainstream.
Conclusion
Open and distance learning is important because it allows education to break out of the
vectors of access, quality and cost. Attempt has been made to see the use of ODL in training
and re-training of teachers. The use of distance education has the potential to distribute
opportunities for learning more widely and equitably across the teaching force. It has also
improved the quality and variety of the resources and support available to teachers, opening
up new avenues to professional development. If social justice is to be achieved, however, in
terms of equity of educational opportunity and services, the provision needs to be planned in
ways that make it available, accessible, acceptable, and adaptable to all teachers and head
teachers, empowering them to make choices in what and how they learn. It also needs
enabling policies in support of these aims as well as commitment towards the adequate
implementation of these policies.
References
Aderinoye, R. and Ojokheta, K. (2004). Open-distance education. Mechanism for sustainable
development: Reflections on the Nigerian experience. International Review of Research in
open and distance learning. 5 (1).
Bell, R. and M. Tight. (1999). 0pen Universities: A British tradition? Society for research into
higher education. Birmingham.UK. Open University Press
(www.undp.org.info21/public/distance/pb- disc2html).
Calvert, B. (1986). Facilitating transfer on distance courses. Paper presented at the 8 th world
conference on development and social opportunity. Delhi, India: Open University.
European Commission (2004). European report on quality of school education. Brussels:
Directorate- general for education and culture, European Commission.
Greenland, J.ed. (1983). The in-service training of primary school teachers in English
Speaking Africa: A report, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Hammond, L.D. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy
2000. Education, policy analysis archives 8
http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8ni/(accessed 24 May 2006).
Mcluhan, M.and Powers, B. (1989).The global village: Transformations in world life in the
21 st century. New York: Oxford University Press.
Perraton, H. Creed, C. and Robinson. (2002). Teacher education guidelines: Using open and
distance learning. Paris: UNESCO.