05.06.2013 Views

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Observatory, England) still lists a possible<br />

supernova remnant in A Catalogue of Galactic<br />

Supernova Remnants, dated 1998. Although the<br />

jury is still out on the origin of the outer infrared<br />

nebula, it's safe to say that to see the Crescent<br />

Nebula is to see the results of several stages of<br />

energetic stellar activity.<br />

Through 7x35 binoculars the nebula's<br />

environs look hazy, but since the remnant lies in<br />

a patchy, star-rich area of the Cygnus Milky Way<br />

and slices through a diamond of 7th- and 8thmagnitude<br />

stars, there is no way to confirm that<br />

this visual impression really constitutes a<br />

detection of the Crescent. On the clearest of<br />

nights the oval shape of NGC 6888 can be<br />

discerned — just barely — at 23x through the 4inch<br />

refractor. <strong>The</strong> nebula's brightest segment is a<br />

sharp needle of light extending southwestward<br />

from the diamond's<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Caldwell</strong> <strong>Objects</strong><br />

27<br />

brightest star (HD 192182, a 7th-magnitude Gtype<br />

star with an 11th-magnitude companion).<br />

So sharp is this needle when seen at low power<br />

that I initially mistook it for some weird diffraction<br />

spike — until I realized I was using a highquality<br />

refractor that causes no such artifacts. In<br />

the 4-inch the star and the spike look like a<br />

distant quasar with a jet shooting outward.<br />

<strong>The</strong> view looks much the same at 72x. But a<br />

concentrated effort (remember to breathe often<br />

and to look away from the eyepiece every now<br />

and then) reveals a patchy extension of very dim<br />

light continuing to the southwest before it gently<br />

curves southeast. Interestingly, I found this<br />

nebulous segment consistently easier to see than<br />

the curved remnant to the northeast, even though<br />

the latter looks brighter in photographs. I<br />

attribute this paradox to the fact that the nebula's<br />

northeastern section lies close to two of the<br />

diamond's stars and, at modest magnifications,<br />

the glare of these bright stars diminishes the<br />

view. By contrast, the southwestern extension,<br />

while fainter, lies in a region free from such<br />

troublemakers.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ultimate visual challenge is to close the<br />

loop on the southeastern side of NGC 6888.1 did<br />

this by using low power and averted vision. Take<br />

plenty of time to confirm what you see. I find<br />

that, with time, the thin vapors waver in and out<br />

of view. Also, if you compare the brightness of<br />

the shell's inner edge with that of the<br />

surrounding region, it should become clear that<br />

your eyes are picking up faint emissions from<br />

excited gases. This glow is more prominent on<br />

the southeastern side.<br />

1 1 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!