05.06.2013 Views

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

49 & 50<br />

knot in a vast nebulous ring that entirely surrounded<br />

the cluster." <strong>The</strong>n his photographs<br />

brought out the entire wreathlike wonder and<br />

earned it the name "Rosette."<br />

Thus, all the NGC pieces of the Rosette<br />

Nebula — 2237, 2238, and 2246 — are but parts of<br />

a single nebular complex. Brent Archinal adds a<br />

strong argument as to why the designation "NGC<br />

2237-9, 46" is incorrect for the Rosette Nebula.<br />

First, NGC 2239 is not, and historically has never<br />

been, part of the nebula. (So references such as<br />

the second edition of Sky Atlas 2000.0 need to be<br />

fixed to reflect that.) Uranometria 2000.0 indicates<br />

that NGC 2239 is a small cluster of stars just westnorthwest<br />

of NGC 2244. Wrong again, says<br />

Archinal, who describes the problem in a Webb<br />

Society monograph, <strong>The</strong> "Non-Existent" Star<br />

Clusters<br />

198<br />

of the RNGC. NGC 2239 is<br />

in fact the same cluster as<br />

NGC 2244, thanks to a<br />

positional error by John<br />

Herschel. Archinal credits<br />

Canadian amateur Alister<br />

Ling for being the first to<br />

note the discrepancy,<br />

which Ling did in 1992<br />

after considering John<br />

Herschel's 1833<br />

description of this object:<br />

"<strong>The</strong> place of an 8thmagnitude<br />

star in the<br />

most compact part of a<br />

large, poor, but brilliant<br />

cluster." Ling astutely<br />

noted that there is no 8thmagnitude<br />

star at those<br />

coordinates, but if we add<br />

1 minute to NGC 2239's<br />

putative right ascension,<br />

we find such a star in<br />

NGC 2244. John<br />

Herschel himself apparently caused the confusion,<br />

as Archinal explains: "He first explicitly<br />

states that this object, h 392 (later NGC 2239) is<br />

the same object as [HVII-2] (later NGC 2244) in<br />

his 1833 observations. He also describes no other<br />

such cluster in this region, so it is quite clear that<br />

he is talking about the one and only . . . large<br />

cluster here. But in the [General Catalogue] . . .<br />

he apparently noticed the discrepancy in right<br />

ascension. Instead of recognizing the 1-minuteof-time<br />

error, he assumed h 392 was a new object<br />

and listed these two objects separately, now as<br />

GC 1420 (h 392) and GC 1424 ([HVII-2]). Later<br />

references of course continued to incorrectly list<br />

this new object." In summary, if simplicity is to<br />

rule, the Rosette Nebula's designation should be<br />

NGC 2237-8, 46; the Rosette's central cluster<br />

should be<br />

Deep-Sky Companions: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Caldwell</strong> <strong>Objects</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!