05.06.2013 Views

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of Herschel's telescope. W then e employed an<br />

eyepiece that gave us a 15' field of view (again, to<br />

match Herschel's) and swept the region. Both of<br />

us saw and studied this asterism, but it seemed<br />

unlikely that Herschel would describe such a<br />

distinct asterism as a "cluster of coarsely scattered<br />

stars." Archinal's thinking on the subject has<br />

evolved since, however. John Herschel never<br />

observed NGC 6882, so his records are of no help.<br />

NGC/IC sleuth Harold G. Corwin (Infrared<br />

Processing and Analysis Center) has buttressed<br />

the notion of redundancy in the case of these two<br />

clusters. He posits that William Herschel made a<br />

15' error (one telescopic field diameter) in his<br />

September 10,1784, observation. "Aside from the<br />

declination difference," he says, "the observations<br />

are consistent with<br />

37<br />

the idea that he saw the same cluster both nights.<br />

This would make NGC 6882 [equal to] NGC<br />

6885." Corwin further notes that William<br />

Herschel found seven objects on September 10,<br />

1784. When Corwin analyzed Herschel's offsets<br />

for all of them — using the Smithsonian<br />

Astrophysical Observatory's star catalog for star<br />

positions and, when necessary, proper motions<br />

— he found that Herschel made significant errors<br />

in his positions for four of these objects. "I was<br />

looking for a pattern in the discrepancies<br />

between William Herschel's positions and the<br />

modern positions," he writes, "but do not see<br />

one. What I do see, though, is a possibility that<br />

his data on that night were taken with somewhat<br />

less care than normal. Distractions? Sleepiness?<br />

Who knows? In any event, there are significant<br />

errors in more than half of his posi-<br />

tions for deep sky objects<br />

that night."<br />

Corwin also notes<br />

that Dreyer documented a<br />

case in which William<br />

Herschel twice recorded the<br />

same nebula (NGC 4208 =<br />

NGC 4212) during the same<br />

sweep — probably within<br />

the same five-minute period<br />

— and entered the object<br />

twice in his lists. "So, it is<br />

possible for [Herschel] to<br />

have observed the same<br />

object twice within a short<br />

period of time without<br />

recognizing it as one he had<br />

seen before," Corwin says.<br />

"This reinforces my feeling<br />

that the 15 arc minute offset<br />

in the position of NGC 6882<br />

is a simple mistake on<br />

[Herschel's] part.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Caldwell</strong> <strong>Objects</strong> 147

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!