05.06.2013 Views

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

39<br />

3 9<br />

Eskimo Nebula; Clown-Face Nebula; Lion Nebula<br />

NGC 2392<br />

Type: Planetary Nebula<br />

Con: Gemini<br />

RA: 07 h 29 m 10.8 s<br />

Dec: +20° 54' 43"<br />

Mag: 9.2<br />

Dim: 47" x 43"<br />

Dist: ~4,000 light-years<br />

Disc: William Herschel, 1787<br />

W. H ERSCHEL: [Observed 17 January 1787] A star of 9th<br />

magnitude with a pretty bright milky nebulosity all around. A<br />

very remarkable phenomenon. (H IV-45)<br />

GC/NGC: Bright, small in angular size, round, a star of 9th<br />

magnitude, a star of 8th magnitude north following [to the<br />

northeast] 100".<br />

T HROUGH SMALL TELESCOPES MOST planetary<br />

nebulae look like pale shells or symmetrical<br />

patches of light. <strong>The</strong>ir enchanting central stars —<br />

whose ionizing ultraviolet rays energize the<br />

nebulae — usually lie just beyond the grasp of<br />

normal vision. But NGC 2392 in Gemini is an<br />

exception. Not only is it bright, being a mere 0.4<br />

magnitude fainter than the famous Ring Nebula<br />

(M57) in Lyra, but its central star all but<br />

dominates the view. Actually it is somewhat<br />

misleading to say that NGC 2392, or any other<br />

planetary nebula for that matter, is "bright";<br />

unlike every other type of deep-sky object, no<br />

planetary nebula is readily accessible to the<br />

unaided eye. NGC 2392 is unquestionably a<br />

telescopic wonder, however. Its singular<br />

appearance compelled the great William<br />

Herschel to call it "a very remarkable phenomenon."<br />

His son John examined the nebula in<br />

an 18¼-inch reflector and agreed; he saw it as an<br />

8th-magnitude star "exactly in the center of an<br />

exactly round bright atmosphere." His<br />

154<br />

use of the word "atmosphere" was appropriate<br />

for the times. In 1755 the Prussian philosopher<br />

and physicist Immanuel Kant hypothesized that<br />

the Sun and planets were born from a rotating<br />

cloud of gas and dust. By the 19th century, when<br />

John Herschel was turning his attention to his<br />

father's discoveries, geologists were using Kant's<br />

nebular hypothesis to explain the formation of<br />

the Earth. In his 1914 work <strong>The</strong> Problem of<br />

Volcanism, which devotes a chapter to nebular<br />

hypotheses, Joseph Iddings explains that<br />

geologists of the 19th century conceived a nebula<br />

as a "homogeneous gas revolving about a central<br />

nucleus and separating into annular zones that<br />

were supposed to condense into the planets and<br />

satellites of the solar system." Any views they<br />

might have had of NGC 2392, with its multiple<br />

shells and bright central core, certainly would<br />

have excited them. Of course, Kant was right in<br />

his thinking, as we know today, but the evidence<br />

that would ultimately verify his theory would<br />

Deep-Sky Companions: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Caldwell</strong> <strong>Objects</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!