05.06.2013 Views

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

74<br />

are 0.8 x 0.5 light-year. Its gases<br />

are expanding away from the<br />

central star at a speed of 14 km<br />

per second.<br />

NGC 3132 lies in a rather<br />

remote section of Vela, just<br />

south of its border with the<br />

dim constellation Antlia, the<br />

Air Pump. If you live at a<br />

southerly locale and have a dark sky, finding the<br />

nebula will not be a problem. Start at 2ndmagnitude<br />

Lambda (λ) Velorum. A little more<br />

than 12° east-northeast of Lambda Velorum is<br />

magnitude-3.8 q Velorum, which forms the<br />

southwestern corner of a 2°-long equilateral<br />

triangle with a 5th- and a 6th-magnitude star.<br />

(Confirm this with your binoculars.) NGC 3132 is<br />

2¼° northwest of q Velorum and 1¼° west (and<br />

ever so slightly south) of the triangle's northern<br />

star.<br />

If your skies are not that great, or if the<br />

object is low to the horizon, you can find the<br />

planetary with an equatorial mount. First locate<br />

2nd-magnitude Zeta (ζ) Puppis with a wide-field<br />

eyepiece and center it in your scope. Zeta is at -<br />

40° exactly, so all you have to do is use your<br />

setting circles to move your telescope 26.2' south<br />

and 2 h 3 m east of Zeta Puppis. <strong>The</strong> planetary<br />

should be obvious. At 23x in the 4-inch NGC<br />

3132 looks like a 9th-magnitude star and<br />

warrants immediate attention at higher powers.<br />

Several sources claim the plan-etary's visual<br />

brightness is magnitude 8.2. But<br />

this is not true. <strong>The</strong> error can be traced to Robert<br />

Burnham Jr.'s Celestial Handbook, which failed to<br />

clarify that 8.2 was the nebula's photographic<br />

magnitude; NGC 3132's apparent visual<br />

brightness is a full magnitude fainter. (This is<br />

precisely the opposite of what one might expect.<br />

But there is a reason for this. To show the<br />

nebula's faint features, photographic exposures<br />

had to be long, and hence they would overexpose<br />

NGC 3132's bright central star, exaggerating the<br />

nebula's total brightness. <strong>The</strong> same problem can<br />

be seen in NGC 246, which has three stars<br />

superimposed on its nebulosity.) This error has<br />

led others to assume that the planetary is brighter<br />

than it truly is. Most plausible published<br />

magnitudes range from 9.2 to 9.7. I observed<br />

NGC 3132 in April 1997 using 7x50 binoculars<br />

and, blissfully unaware of the controversy, I<br />

made an independent visual estimate of<br />

magnitude 9.2.<br />

Not much is gained by boosting the magnification<br />

of the 4-inch to 72x, though the nebula's<br />

nature is clearly revealed by a slightly swollen<br />

body like a star just out of focus. With a pro-<br />

294 Deep-Sky Companions: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Caldwell</strong> <strong>Objects</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!