05.06.2013 Views

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ly east of NGC 362 we find the magnitude-12.3<br />

galaxy NGC 406, a tiny spindle just 2.9' long. In<br />

photographs it displays two peculiar spiral arms<br />

that are festooned with bright knots. How large a<br />

telescope is needed to see the knots?<br />

Next to Omega Centauri (<strong>Caldwell</strong> 80), 47<br />

Tucanae is the brightest globular in the heavens.<br />

But Omega Centauri's top ranking seems<br />

insignificant once you realize that it is only 0.05<br />

magnitude (5 percent) brighter than 47 Tucanae.<br />

<strong>The</strong> magnificent 47 Tucanae is also 1.25<br />

magnitudes (3 times) brighter than the brightest<br />

Messier globular, M22 in Sagittarius, and its<br />

diameter is 30 percent larger than M22's. <strong>The</strong><br />

cluster's true physical size is 214 light-years —<br />

nearly twice that of NGC 362 — and its apparent<br />

diameter is some 60 percent larger than the full<br />

Moon's. Like NGC 362, 47 Tucanae is a relatively<br />

metal-rich cluster, with 1/6 as much iron in each<br />

of its stars as there is in our Sun. Its integrated<br />

spectral type is a yellowish G4. Unlike NGC 362,<br />

47 Tucanae is receding from us, at a paltry 19 km<br />

per second.<br />

Many works say that 47 Tucanae was not<br />

discovered by astronomers before 1751, when<br />

104 & 106<br />

Abbe Nicolas Louis de Lacaille swept up this<br />

spectacular object and kicked off his 1755 catalog<br />

with it. After seeing it through a ½-inch 8x<br />

telescope he said 47 Tucanae was "like the<br />

nucleus of a fairly bright comet." (Ironically he<br />

placed it in his Class I, "nebulae without stars.")<br />

But 47 Tucanae does have a history that predates<br />

Lacaille's telescopic observation. <strong>The</strong> cluster<br />

appears as a "star" just west of Nubecula Minor<br />

(the Small Magellanic Cloud) on Bayer's<br />

Uranometria, which was first published in 1603.<br />

Bayer never did see that "star" himself, and his<br />

information on far-southern stars came not from<br />

astronomers but from explorers who journeyed<br />

south of the equator. Indeed, the first catalogs of<br />

southern stars were those of the Dutch navigators<br />

Pieter Dirckszoon Keyser (published around<br />

1595, and now missing) and Frederick de<br />

Houtman (published in 1603). Had these<br />

explorers possessed a keener understanding of<br />

the heavens, they undoubtedly would have<br />

noticed that the "star" just west of the Small<br />

Magellanic Cloud might appear swollen to the<br />

attentive naked eye. (I have seen it this way from<br />

Africa, with the "star" only 10° above the horizon,<br />

and I'm certain many aboriginal skywatchers<br />

would have done the same.) Astronomers did not<br />

study the southern sky in any detail until a 20year-old<br />

Edmond Halley went to St. Helena in<br />

1676 with the sole purpose of cataloging the<br />

southern stars. Halley, who had "poor eyesight,"<br />

spent 18 months on that remote South Atlantic<br />

island, plagued by inclement weather, an<br />

arrogant governor, and harsh living conditions.<br />

In the end Halley cataloged only 341 stars. He did<br />

discover the diffuse nature of Omega Centauri<br />

(<strong>Caldwell</strong> 80), however, and given more clear<br />

nights he undoubtedly would have discovered<br />

the fuzzy nature of 47 Tucanae before Lacaille<br />

did.<br />

In the 19th century Benjamin Apthorp<br />

Gould (1824-1896), the founder and first direc-<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Caldwell</strong> <strong>Objects</strong> 413

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!