05.06.2013 Views

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

years. A total of 43 star-cluster candidates have<br />

also been located, of which 18 are probable open<br />

star clusters. (IC 1613 contains no bright globular<br />

clusters.) Hubble Space Telescope observations of<br />

roughly 700 square light-years in the galaxy's<br />

core support the notion that IC 1613 is still<br />

birthing stars. For the past 250 to 350 million<br />

years, the galaxy has had a roughly constant starformation<br />

rate of about 35,000 suns per year,<br />

which is about 50 percent lower than it was 400<br />

to 900 million years ago.<br />

<strong>The</strong> galaxy is also rich in supergiant stars,<br />

and spectroscopic observations with the William<br />

Herschel Telescope on La Palma in the Canary<br />

Islands have revealed six interlocking interstellar<br />

shells in IC 1613. <strong>The</strong> shells are gigantic, with<br />

diameters ranging from 220 to 1,000 light-years,<br />

and they are expanding at speeds up to 50 km<br />

per second. Stellar winds associated with<br />

supernova explosions seem to drive this<br />

expansion. <strong>The</strong> region could be the first stage in<br />

the formation of a supergiant<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Caldwell</strong> <strong>Objects</strong><br />

51<br />

shell with a diameter greater than 3,000 lightyears.<br />

Others have found that expanding "superbubbles"<br />

cover the whole of the galaxy. Each<br />

superbubble contains at least one stellar association,<br />

and the more massive stars in these associations<br />

seem to be quite important in shaping<br />

the interstellar medium of the galaxy.<br />

HST also imaged Cepheid variable stars in<br />

IC 1613, and those stars confirmed R. Brent<br />

Tully's distance determination of 2.3 million<br />

light-years, which was derived by more indirect<br />

means.<br />

Finding the field containing IC 1613 is not<br />

hard, but seeing the galaxy is another thing. Start<br />

by finding the 4th-magnitude stars Epsilon (ε)<br />

and Delta (δ) Piscium in the southernmost Fish's<br />

cord. <strong>The</strong> center of a tight equilateral triangle of<br />

roughly 6th-magnitude stars — 73, 77, and 80<br />

Piscium — lies just 2½° south-southeast of<br />

Epsilon Piscium. Confirm the presence of these<br />

stars with binoculars. A curved line of three stars<br />

(magnitudes 6.3, 8.0, and 7.2, respectively)<br />

trickles 2½° south of 77 Piscium, bending ever so<br />

slightly east, then west, in the process. IC 1613 is<br />

immediately south of the third and southernmost<br />

(7th-magnitude) star, which places it inside of<br />

another 1°-wide triangle comprising the justmentioned<br />

7th-mag-nitude star and two 6thmagnitude<br />

stars (29 and 26 Ceti). Be certain you<br />

have the right field, because 29 and 26 Ceti are<br />

part of a northeast-southwest trending line of<br />

stars. For those who own an equatorial mount, IC<br />

1613 is 3½° due south of 73 Piscium in the first<br />

triangle. All these stars are visible in the finder<br />

chart on page 206.<br />

I tried unsuccessfully to see IC 1613 on<br />

several nights in 1997. How utterly absurd, I<br />

thought, that Patrick <strong>Caldwell</strong>-Moore would<br />

have selected such an object for his catalog. How<br />

did he expect anyone to see such a hideously dim<br />

galaxy? I knew of no guide that<br />

205

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!