05.06.2013 Views

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1" in a mere four days. Clearly, Lampland contended,<br />

such changes could not be related to<br />

physical movements of material, since that would<br />

imply matter being propelled across space at<br />

supernatural velocities. Besides, any details that<br />

vanished in the cloud mysterious-<br />

46<br />

ly reappeared, then disappeared, again and<br />

again, in the same locations. Lampland concluded<br />

that dark shadows — like those cast by<br />

the Moon onto the Earth during solar eclipses —<br />

were sweeping across the nebula to cause the<br />

observed effects. Such shadows, he believed,<br />

were cast by clouds of dust traveling very close<br />

to the nebula's light source.<br />

Investigation continued. Using Lick Observatory's<br />

120-inch reflector visually under<br />

excellent seeing conditions in 1959, George<br />

Herbig zoomed in on R Monocerotis and found it<br />

to be a tiny triangular nebula "about 5" long,<br />

increasing in surface brightness toward the<br />

southern apex, fading out smoothly to the north,<br />

but with sharp, well defined edges on east and<br />

west. No star could be seen. In poor seeing or<br />

with low resolution, R Monocerotis would look<br />

simply like a diffuse 12th-magnitude star." <strong>The</strong>n<br />

in 1966 Frank Low and Bruce J. Smith announced<br />

that R Monocerotis was a "cocoon" nebula — a<br />

dusty envelope of gas (out of which planets<br />

might form) around a newborn star. R<br />

Monocerotis was the first nebula of this kind to<br />

be discovered; astronomers had predicted their<br />

existence just a year earlier. <strong>The</strong> team's evidence<br />

was the large amount of infrared radiation that R<br />

Monocerotis emitted relative to its output of<br />

visible light. <strong>The</strong> scientists hypothesized that the<br />

visible light ultimately came from a newborn star<br />

at the center of a dusty cocoon 200 astronomical<br />

units across. <strong>The</strong> l0th-magni-tude "knot" we see<br />

in our telescopes as R Monocerotis, they argued,<br />

is that cocoon of dust being illuminated from<br />

within. In a sense this discovery was not new,<br />

for, as Edwin Hubble reported in 1916, the 19thcentury<br />

observer William Lassell believed R<br />

Monocerotis was not a star—an opinion Edward<br />

Emerson Barnard shared after viewing the<br />

nebulous "star" with the 40-inch refractor at<br />

Yerkes<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Caldwell</strong> <strong>Objects</strong> 183

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!