05.06.2013 Views

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ightness by summing the contributions of the<br />

stars in each cluster as recorded on photographic<br />

plates. <strong>The</strong> differences among published values<br />

may reflect (1) differences in the numbers of stars<br />

used, and (2) whether the total magnitude<br />

includes any bright stars superimposed on the<br />

clusters. (On photographic plates the<br />

overexposed images of bright stars will lead to<br />

spuriously bright total magnitude estimates.)<br />

Motivated by these discrepancies, in February<br />

1998 I estimated the brightness of the individual<br />

clusters with the naked eye, both in deep twilight<br />

and under a dark sky, and got an average visual<br />

magnitude of 4.5 for NGC 869 and 5.7 for NGC<br />

884. Brent Archinal suspects that these visual<br />

estimates are close to what one would get by<br />

including the stars that are too bright to be<br />

measured on photographs.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Double Cluster resides in a Milky Way<br />

spiral arm (the Perseus Arm) that lies farther<br />

from the galactic center than the one containing<br />

our solar system (the Orion Arm). A recent study<br />

places the clusters 7,300 light-years<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Caldwell</strong> <strong>Objects</strong><br />

14<br />

from Earth. <strong>The</strong>se clusters<br />

probably formed from a<br />

single cloud of dust and<br />

gas, perhaps 13 million<br />

years ago. We see the<br />

Double Cluster through<br />

thick clouds of interstellar<br />

dust that line the plane of<br />

the Milky Way. Were it not<br />

for this dust, we would see<br />

the Double Cluster shining<br />

1.6 magnitudes (4.4 times)<br />

brighter. <strong>The</strong> obscuration is<br />

unfortunate because, of the<br />

300 or so suns that populate<br />

each of the two<br />

clusters, many are hot, bluewhite<br />

supergiants; yet interstellar dimming lets<br />

even the brightest of these appear no brighter<br />

than magnitude 6.5. Imagine the grandeur of the<br />

Double Cluster if it were at the distance of the<br />

Pleiades (407 light-years). It would recall the<br />

starscape described in Isaac Asimov's story,<br />

"Nightfall." <strong>The</strong> twin mounds of blue supergiants<br />

would each span 5 Moon diameters and shine<br />

300 times brighter than they actually do in our<br />

skies. One-quarter of the northern sky would be<br />

filled with the concentrated splendor of 600 suns,<br />

the brightest of which would shine with the<br />

brilliance of Vega. <strong>The</strong> earliest skywatchers<br />

would have succumbed to the Double Cluster's<br />

presence, looked to it for meaning, and planned<br />

their affairs in step with its eternal rhythms.<br />

Poets and artists would have looked upon these<br />

twin celestial cities to fuel their passions, or<br />

perhaps simply to dream.<br />

But we have to settle for the more subtle<br />

view. To the naked eye, each cluster has a central<br />

condensation and a mottled outer halo. Try<br />

resolving some of the stars in the Double<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!