05.06.2013 Views

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

92<br />

Eta Carinae produces the brightest<br />

known stellar wind, which<br />

might also explain the star's<br />

unique X-ray-emitting sheet of<br />

scorching hot gas (60 million<br />

degrees Kelvin). <strong>The</strong> X-ray emission<br />

probably arises as stellar<br />

winds flowing away from each<br />

member in the binary pair collide,<br />

or, if Eta Carinae is a solitary<br />

star, by a fast wind colliding with<br />

an older, slower one. A binary<br />

system would also explain why<br />

the star's spectrum changes, with<br />

clocklike precision, every 5½<br />

years. Augusto Damineli<br />

(University of Sao Paulo, Brazil)<br />

and his colleagues observed Eta<br />

Carinae during a predicted 1998<br />

episode of spectral change. From<br />

their data they deduced that the<br />

star is indeed a binary system whose members<br />

travel around a common center of mass in highly<br />

elongated orbits every 5.53 years. However, in a<br />

2000 Astrophysical Journal paper Davidson admits<br />

that HST could not confirm that model with its<br />

high-resolution spectrographs.<br />

As astronomers continue to delve deeper<br />

into these many mysteries, most agree on one<br />

thing: Eta Carinae doesn't have much longer to<br />

live. <strong>The</strong> star is one of only a few luminous blue<br />

variables in the Milky Way. <strong>The</strong>se extremely<br />

massive stars live their lives in the fast lane of<br />

stellar evolution, and Eta Carinae could demolish<br />

itself in a supernova explosion today, tomorrow,<br />

or in a few hundred thousand years. (In fact,<br />

since it lies thousands of light-years away, it may<br />

have done so already. Doesn't all this excitement<br />

make you want to grab your telescope, and, if<br />

necessary, a seat on a southbound jet?)<br />

366<br />

Back to our historical conundrum. Considering<br />

Eta Carinae's dramatic variability, isn't it possible<br />

that the brightness of the Eta Carinae Nebula<br />

itself changes with time? Of course it is —<br />

especially since erratic Eta Carinae is the most<br />

powerful star in what is now the brightest section<br />

of the nebula. According to Allen, the "most<br />

brilliant portion [of the nebula], as drawn by Sir<br />

John Herschel, seems to have disappeared at<br />

some time between 1837 and 1871." Impossible?<br />

Not really, especially if you consider how other<br />

variable nebulae, such as Hubble's Variable<br />

Nebula (<strong>Caldwell</strong> 46) and the R Coronae<br />

Australis Nebula (<strong>Caldwell</strong> 68), behave. (<strong>The</strong> Eta<br />

Carinae case also tells us something about the<br />

value of astronomical drawings.) I know of no<br />

catalogs that offer brightness estimates for the Eta<br />

Carinae Nebula. In June 2000 I estimated the<br />

nebula's brightness as magnitude 4.5. Given the<br />

nebula's likely variability, it's entirely possible<br />

that<br />

Deep-Sky Companions: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Caldwell</strong> <strong>Objects</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!