05.06.2013 Views

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

90<br />

2867 as a "star," but a fair bit of magnification and<br />

a stable atmosphere are required to identify it as<br />

a planetary nebula. (That is, unless you slip an<br />

Oxygen III filter in front of your eyepiece, then<br />

out; this will briefly pop the nebula in and out of<br />

view.)<br />

Several times I looked at NGC 2867 when it<br />

was low to the horizon from Hawaii. Under such<br />

circumstances the field stars were so bloated,<br />

they all looked like planetary nebulae, even at 23x<br />

in the 4-inch, and higher powers only magnified<br />

their swollen masses. But when the object was<br />

higher in the sky, and the stars appeared as tacksharp<br />

points of light, the nebula revealed itself as<br />

a slightly swollen disk, especially with averted<br />

vision. At 72x its tight inner disk was surrounded<br />

by a faint, thin ring of diffuse light. I have seen<br />

this feature several times. It shows best with<br />

medium magnification; high power tends to<br />

magnify the dim light beyond recognition. <strong>The</strong><br />

inner disk is so condensed, however, that you can<br />

crank up the power to ridiculously high levels<br />

while viewing it. But don't be disappointed if you<br />

still cannot see much more than what I've<br />

described here. Even when seen through a<br />

356<br />

12½-inch telescope, the object has been reported<br />

as "small." Andrew Murrell (Ilford, Australia)<br />

used a 20-inch f/5 Dobsonian at 200x on NGC<br />

2867 and saw a "small bright planetary with a<br />

diameter of 20"." He also said it had an even<br />

surface brightness, and he saw no central star.<br />

"<strong>The</strong> planetary appeared round," he continues,<br />

"even with high magnification. At low power, the<br />

planetary had a very pale aqua colour which was<br />

lost when observing above 200x." Ernst Hartung<br />

also saw a "pale blue" color. Using 72x with the 4inch<br />

on May 24, 2000, I had momentary<br />

impressions of a pale glacial blue cast, like that of<br />

the daytime sky reflected in ice. I know of no<br />

positive sightings of the 15th-magnitude central<br />

star, which may vary in brightness.<br />

Fortunately we have instruments like the<br />

Hubble Space Telescope, which can turn the<br />

mundane into the magnificent. HST showed<br />

NGC 2867 to be a multishelled planetary with a<br />

prominent ring (like M57's) that appears<br />

"dented" on its eastern edge, as if a car had<br />

accidentally backed into it. Close inspection<br />

shows that ring to be clotted and irregular. That<br />

bright annulus also is surrounded by a turbulent<br />

collar of glowing green gas. Inside the ring is a<br />

faint ellipsoidal cloud, with the hot central star<br />

"pushed" against its western edge. It's as if we<br />

are looking down a barrel at the central star from<br />

a slight angle. In essence, we are doing just that;<br />

the inner oval is what we see when we look<br />

down the funnel of a bipolar flow of gas, while<br />

the fainter outer halo is the remnant of the slow<br />

wind that the central star cast off when it was<br />

still a red giant. Recent studies place NGC 2867<br />

about 5,500 light-years distant, making the shell's<br />

true physical extent 0.3 light-year. Some<br />

estimates, however, place the nebula 1,600 lightyears<br />

farther out, which would increase the<br />

planetary's true diameter by about 30 percent.<br />

Deep-Sky Companions: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Caldwell</strong> <strong>Objects</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!