05.06.2013 Views

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

80<br />

ulae in de Cheseaux's list, he could not have<br />

scrutinized Omega Centauri because it was<br />

always below his horizon. Clearly, then, his<br />

description was based solely on Halley's impressions.<br />

Omega Centauri's true nature also eluded<br />

the keen eye of Louis de Lacaille, who listed the<br />

object in his 1755 catalog under the category of<br />

"nebulae without stars." Mind you, Lacaille<br />

observed with a simple ½-inch 8x telescope — an<br />

instrument inferior to most of today's binoculars.<br />

He described it as a "[nebula] in Centaurus; with<br />

simple view, it looks like a star of 3rd magnitude<br />

viewed through light mist, and through the<br />

telescope like a big comet badly bounded."<br />

Some sources imply that Sir John Herschel<br />

first identified Omega Centauri as a star cluster.<br />

His famous account makes the notion plausible:<br />

"<strong>The</strong> noble globular cluster ω Centauri, beyond<br />

all comparison the richest and largest object of its<br />

kind in the heavens. <strong>The</strong> stars are literally<br />

innumerable, and as their total light when<br />

received by the naked eye affects it hardly more<br />

than a star of the 5th or [5th to 4th] magnitude,<br />

the minuteness of<br />

320<br />

each may be imagined: it must however be recollected<br />

that as the total area over which the stars<br />

are diffused is very [considerable] (not less than a<br />

quarter of a square degree), the resultant<br />

impression on the sensorium is doubtless thereby<br />

much enfeebled, and that the same quantity of<br />

light concentrated on a single point of the retina<br />

would very probably exceed in effect a star of the<br />

3rd magnitude."<br />

But alas, even this claim is wrong. Who,<br />

then, first resolved Omega Centauri into stars?<br />

None other than James Dunlop, that "gentleman<br />

astronomer" from Parramatta, New South Wales.<br />

It is the 440th object in his 1827 catalog. Omega<br />

Centauri, wrote Dunlop, "is a beautiful large<br />

bright round nebula, about 10' or 12' diameter,<br />

easily resolvable to the very centre; it is a<br />

beautiful globe of stars very gradually and<br />

moderately compressed to the centre; the stars<br />

are rather scattered preceding and following<br />

[west and east], and the greatest concentration is<br />

rather north of the centre: the stars are of slightly<br />

mixed magnitudes, of a white colour. This is the<br />

largest bright nebula in the southern<br />

hemisphere."<br />

Deep-Sky Companions: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Caldwell</strong> <strong>Objects</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!