05.06.2013 Views

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

The Caldwell Objects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

60 & 61<br />

more spectacularly, the Hubble Space Telescope<br />

has revealed a brilliant fireworks show within the<br />

dynamic duo. Hubble uncovered more than 1,000<br />

bright, young star clusters bursting to life as a<br />

result of the collision between NGC 4038 and<br />

NGC 4039. <strong>The</strong> brightest of these clusters<br />

contains roughly a million stars, all just a few<br />

million years old. One cluster, in NGC 4038's<br />

northern arm, looks like a miniature barred spiral<br />

galaxy itself. Indeed, some of the system's<br />

newborn clusters appear to be young globulars,<br />

while others may ultimately congeal to form<br />

globular clusters perhaps a billion years from<br />

now. <strong>The</strong> Hubble images also show<br />

unprecedented detail in the streams of reddish<br />

dust bleeding across the comma-shaped surface<br />

of NGC 4038 and fun-neling onto the core of<br />

smaller NGC 4039.<br />

What of this drama, if anything, can one see<br />

through a small telescope? Certainly the details<br />

of a distant galaxy merger are far too difficult to<br />

see with anything but the largest of instruments<br />

— right? When Walter Scott Houston observed<br />

NGC 4038 and NGC 4039 through a 4-inch Clark<br />

refractor from the "indifferent skies" of Haddam,<br />

Connecticut, he saw "little more than an<br />

asymmetrical 11th-magnitude blur." One<br />

problem is that the galaxies have low surface<br />

brightnesses; to see them well, we need to be<br />

under dark skies and to have a lot of patience. Be<br />

aware that an 11th-magnitude galaxy, NGC 4027,<br />

lies about 45' southwest of the Antennae — one<br />

of the duo's common nicknames — and is closer<br />

to 31 Crateris than our targets are. Houston<br />

suspected that many amateurs had sent him<br />

descriptions of that galaxy rather than of the<br />

Ringtail (yet another nickname for the galaxy<br />

pair). You've got the correct object in view if it is<br />

part of an arc of four roughly 9th-magnitude<br />

stars flowing from 31 Crateris to the north-northeast.<br />

(<strong>The</strong> first two stars form a roughly 5'-<br />

242<br />

wide pair 20' from 31 Crateris.) <strong>The</strong> Ringtail (or<br />

the Antennae, if you prefer) is just south of the<br />

fourth (and brightest) star in the arc. Those living<br />

under dark skies might want to challenge<br />

themselves by trying to see the pair in binoculars.<br />

This is an especially good challenge for those<br />

attending the Texas Star Party. I found them just<br />

barely at the threshold of visibility in 7x35<br />

binoculars from Hawaii. I have not read of any<br />

other binocular sightings.<br />

In the 4-inch at 23x, the Ringtail looks undeniably<br />

double. Or is it more accurate to say it is<br />

elongated, with a dark but tenuous wedge to the<br />

west? <strong>The</strong> northwestern component, NGC 4038,<br />

appears much brighter and larger than NGC 4039<br />

to the southeast. (This supports the NGC<br />

descriptions on page 239.) I'm certain that the<br />

magnitudes given by the Deep Sky Field Guide<br />

(and used in the table above) for the Antennae<br />

are incorrect; they make NGC 4038 and NGC<br />

4039 seem near-equals in brightness. Christian<br />

Luginbuhl and Brian Skiff's Observing Handbook<br />

and Catalogue of Deep-Sky <strong>Objects</strong> lists a magnitude<br />

of 10.7 for NGC 4038 but does not provide one<br />

for NGC 4039; Roger<br />

Deep-Sky Companions: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Caldwell</strong> <strong>Objects</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!